Martinez v. CSS

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/1/09 re 21 ORDERING that pursuant to the parties' stipulation, this case is REMANDED to the agency pursuant to sentence four of USC405(g). CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAWRENCE G. BROWN United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration ARMAND D. ROTH Special Assistant United States Attorney California Bar No. 214624 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8924 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail:Armand.Roth@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ANGIE MARTINEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 08-cv-02841-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SENTENCE FOUR REMAND The parties have agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The purpose of the remand is for the ALJ to further consider Plaintiff's maximum residual functional capacity and to consider the issue of disability for the period after the Plaintiff attained age 50. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Laura Krank* LAURA KRANK Plaintiff's Attorney * by Armand Roth by email authorization of 10/1/09 ///// ///// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ddad1/orders.socsec/martinez2841.stipord.remand LAWRENCE G. BROWN United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration Dated: October 1, 2009 /s/ Armand D. Roth ARMAND D. ROTH) Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: October 1, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?