Emanuel Romanian Penecostal, et al v. Chertoff, et al
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/6/2009 8 ORDERING that the date for filing the government's Answer to the complaint is EXTENDED to 4/2/2009.(Reader, L)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2729 Attorneys for Defendants
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EMANUEL ROMANIAN PENTECOSTAL ) CHURCH, GABRIEL ALIN BOB & ) LAVINIA MONICA BOB, ) ) Petitioners/Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SECRETARY OF ) HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. ) ) Defendants/Respondents. No. 2:08-cv-02871-MCE-EFB JOINT STIPULATION RE: FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE DEFENDANTS' ANSWER AND ORDER
This is an immigration case in which plaintiffs/petitioners have challenged the denial of their applications to adjust status by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS). Due to the complexity of the issues presented in this matter, government counsel requests additional time to respond to the complaint, the parties stipulate to a first extension of time in which to file the government's answer to the complaint, until April 2, 2009.
Dated: February 2, 2009 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney
By:
/s/Audrey Hemesath Audrey B. Hemesath Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for the Defendants /s/ Jagdip Singh Sekhon Jagdip Singh Sekhon Attorney for the Plaintiff -1-
By:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 6, 2009
ORDER Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the date for filing the government's Answer to the complaint is extended to April 2, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?