Tucker v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/3/2011 ORDERING that dispositional documents are to be filed no later than 90 days.(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WILLIAM TERRELL TUCKER,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

No. CIV S-08-2991 LKK EFB P

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,

14
Defendants.

ORDER
/

15

Pursuant to the April 20, 2011 minutes for the settlement conference, and plaintiff’s

16
17

“Dismissal of All Claims with Prejudice,”1 the court has determined that the above-captioned

18

case has settled. See Dckt. Nos. 42, 43.
The court now orders that dispositional documents are to be filed not later than ninety

19
20

(90) days from the date of this order.2

21

////

22
1

23
24

This document, while filed on defense counsel’s letterhead, is signed only by plaintiff
and fails to comply with the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
2

25
26

The parties are hereby informed that their stipulation of dismissal may contain a
provision allowing the court to retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the
settlement.
1

1
2
3
4

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on any
and all counsel or parties who contributed to the violation of this order.
So ordered.
DATED: May 3, 2011.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2