Farewell v. Dillon

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/16/09 ORDERING that 2 pltf's IFP appl is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send pltf a new ifp appl. Pltf shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed appl to proceed IFP.(Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. NANCY J. DILLON, Defendant. / Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff's application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is dismissed without prejudice; 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PETER W. FAREWELL, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-3000 KJM P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /mp fare3000.3d 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. DATED: January 16, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?