Four in One Company, Inc. v. SK Foods, L.P. et al

Filing 186

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/24/2011 GRANTING 173 Motion for Extended Stay of Discovery. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
R. STEVEN LAPHAM
MATTHEW SEGAL
Assistant U.S. Attorneys
501 “I” Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, California 95814
[phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10

ANNA TRYON PLETCHER
TAI S. MILDER
RICHARD B. COHEN
Trial Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Room 10-0101
San Francisco, CA 94102
[phone]
[phone] (fax)

11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14

FOUR IN ONE COMPANY, INC.,

15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
SK FOODS, L.P., et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20

This Document Relates to All
Consolidated Cases

21
22
23
24

2:09-cv-00027-MCE-EFB
2:08-cv-03074-MCE-EFB
2:09-cv-00442-MCE-EFB

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:08-CV-03017-MCEEFB

ORDER TO EXTEND LIMITED STAY
OF DISCOVERY

)
)

ORDER TO EXTEND LIMITED STAY OF DISCOVERY

25

WHEREAS on November 12, 2010, this Court entered an Order

26

granting a limited stay of discovery for six (6) months, which

27

expired on May 12, 2011 (“November 12, 2010 Stay Order”);

28

1

WHEREAS the criminal trial in United States v. Frederick

2

Scott Salyer, Case No. 2:10-CR-0061 LKK, is set to begin on

3

April 17, 2012;

4

WHEREAS, on May 6, 2011, the United States filed a Motion

5

to Extend Limited Stay of Discovery seeking extension of the

6

November 12, 2010 Stay Order until the conclusion of the above-

7

referenced criminal trial;

8
9
10

Whereas, on June 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Statement of
Non-Opposition to the United States’ Motion to Extend Limited
Stay of Discovery;

11
12

Whereas the Parties have met and conferred and agreed to
request an extension of the November 12, 2010 Stay Order;

13

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

14

1.

15

the six (6) month period following entry of an Order by the

16

Court extending the stay ("Stay Period"), unless further

17

extended by the Court.

18

2.

19

the previous order granting a stay, with the clarification that

20

"document discovery," as used in paragraph 6(a) of the previous

21

order, shall be read to include not only requests under Fed. R.

22

Civ. P. 34 for "documents," but also all for all other

23

materials identified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1)(A) and

24

34(a)(1)(B).

25

3.

26

depositions that are not stayed under the previous stay order.

The November 12, 2010 Stay Order shall be extended during

Discovery will be permitted consistent with the terms of

Parties shall meet and confer regarding the taking of

27
28

2

1

4.

2

beyond the expiration of the Stay Period, it shall file a

3

motion for such a further stay in accordance with the Eastern

4

District of California Local Rules.

5
6

If the United States seeks a further stay of discovery

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 24, 2011.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3