Four in One Company, Inc. v. SK Foods, L.P. et al
Filing
252
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/7/14 ORDERING that a Further Status Conference is SET for 4/2/2015 in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
FOUR IN ONE COMPANY, INC,
DIVERSIFIED FOODS & SEASONINGS,
INC., BRUCE FOODS CORPORATION,
and CLIFFSTAR CORPORATION, on
behalf of themselves and all other similarly
situated,
17
18
19
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
15
16
No. 2:08-cv-03017-KJM-EFB
v.
SK FOODS, L.P., INGOMAR PACKING
COMPANY, LOS GATOS TOMATO
PRODUCTS, SCOTT SALYER, STUART
WOOLF, and GREG PRUETT,
Defendants,
20
21
22
The court held a status conference on October 2, 2014 to discuss the progress of
23
distribution of the net settlement fund and other related matters. Arthur Bailey appeared for
24
plaintiffs; Malcolm Segal appeared for Scott Salyer. Stephen Neuwirth, Stephen Zovickian,
25
George Nicoud and Kevin Coleman appeared by telephone to monitor the proceedings.
26
The distribution of the net settlement fund is currently scheduled to occur on or
27
before October 14, 2014. At the conference, the parties informed the court it may be necessary to
28
postpone that date. The parties shall attempt to resolve outstanding problems identifying and
1
1
verifying settlement claims and inform the court no later than October 10, 2014 whether they are
2
requesting additional time to complete distribution of the net settlement fund.
3
The parties shall meet and confer to exhaust efforts to reach an agreement whereby
4
plaintiffs dismiss the action as to SK Foods, L.P. and Scott Salyer.
5
A further status conference is set for April 2, 2015.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED: October 7, 2014.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?