Four in One Company, Inc. v. SK Foods, L.P. et al
Filing
293
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/28/2020 CONTINUING the Status Conference to 9/24/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, to address the status of the distributions to the Class and the closing of this action. (Huang, H)
5
Michael P. Lehmann
Arthur N. Bailey, Jr.
HAUSFELD LLP
600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 633-1908
Facsimile: (415) 358-4980
mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
abailey@hausfeldllp.com
6
Class Counsel
7
[Additional counsel on signature page]
1
2
3
4
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
13
FOUR IN ONE COMPANY, INC.,
on behalf of itself and all others similarly
situated,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 08-cv-3017 KJM EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE
v.
SK FOODS, L.P., INGOMAR PACKING
COMPANY, LOS GATOS TOMATO
PRODUCTS, SCOTT SALYER, STUART
WOOLF and GREG PRUETT,
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
March 5, 2019
2:30 p.m.
Courtroom 3
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2014, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of California entered an order confirming the "Second Amended Joint Plan of Liquidation
of SK Foods, LP and its Substantively Consolidated Affiliates (July 16, 2014)" [Dkt. No. 4980]
(the "SK Foods Bankruptcy Plan") in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy action filed by Defendant SK
Foods, L.P. (Case No. 09-29162-D-11); and
WHEREAS, Class counsel has informed undersigned counsel for Scott Salyer of the
following facts relating to SK Foods bankruptcy proceedings; and
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
-1-
CASE NO. 08-CV-3017
1
WEREAS, all funds from the Class settlements with Ingomar Packing Company, Los
2
Gatos Tomato Products, Stuart Woolf and Greg Pruett have been paid and distributed to the Class
3
and Final Judgment has been entered as to these Defendants in the consolidated cases Four in
4
One Company v. SF Foods, LP, et al. (Case No. 2:08-cv-03017-KJM-EFB), Diversified Foods
5
and Seasoning, Inc. v. SK Foods, et al. (Case No. 2:08-cv-03074 KJM-EFB), Bruce Foods
6
Corporation v. SK Foods, LP, et al. (Case No. 2:09-cv-00027-KJM-EFB), and Cliffstar
7
Corporation v. SK Foods, LP, et al. (Case No. 2:09-cv-00442-KJM-EFB) (the “Consolidated
8
Cases”); and
9
WHEREAS a portion of the funds previously recovered through the SK Foods bankruptcy
10
action have been paid and distributed to the Class in the Consolidated Cases, and the only
11
potential source of further distributions to the Class are additional funds recovered pursuant to the
12
SK Foods Bankruptcy Plan in the bankruptcy action; and
13
WHEREAS, Defendant SK Foods had affiliated companies in Australia, including SK
14
Foods Australia Pty Ltd., (“SKFA”) which were liquidated; and the liquidators of SKFA did not
15
follow proper procedures in paying themselves approximately five million seven hundred
16
thousand Australian dollars (“AUD”) from the liquidation thereby requiring the liquidators to file
17
an application for approval of remuneration with the Federal Court of Australia; and
18
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2019, the Federal Court of Australia issued a ruling on the
19
liquidators’ remuneration application providing for a reduction in their allowed compensation,
20
and on June 12, 2019, issued an order regarding implementation of the reduction and providing
21
that the liquidators will have to refund approximately AUD$1.9 million, plus interest, or around
22
AUD$2.7 million; and
23
WHEREAS, the Chapter 11 Trustee informed Class Counsel that the liquidators repaid
24
AUD$2.7 million to SKFA and affiliated companies, and that ninety (90%) percent of the funds
25
refunded by the liquidators (less currency conversion fees) have been paid to the Trustee; and that
26
the Trustee was preparing for distribution to unsecured creditors pursuant to the SK Foods
27
Bankruptcy Plan, an amount of approximately USD$1.6 million (90% of the AUD$2.7 at the
28
estimated exchange rate); and
STIPULATION AND ORDER
-2-
CASE NO. 08-CV-3017
1
WHEREAS, The Chapter 11 Trustee has informed Class Counsel that, in addition to the
2
Australian funds, the Trustee was preparing approximately $3.4 million to distribute resulting in
3
total distribution of approximately $5 million to the unsecured creditors; and
4
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2020, the Chapter 11 Trustee mailed a check to the escrow
5
agent of Class Counsel for $306,954.36, an amount representing the second distribution to the
6
Class of the Allowed General Unsecured Claim Amount of $10.6 million based on a distribution
7
rate of 2.895796%, which was deposited into the escrow account for this case held by Class
8
Counsel (the “Escrow Account Funds”); and
9
WHEREAS, the Chapter 11 Trusted has informed Class Counsel that as of approximately
10
January 16, 2020, the Trustee has made final distributions of bankruptcy funds to unsecured
11
creditors and the Class, but anticipates some uncashed checks and returned mail, which under the
12
plan and trust agreement the Trustee must wait 90 days for those checks to settle out, after which
13
time the Trustee will file a motion to address any unclaimed funds or redistributions, if needed,
14
and close the case; and
15
WHEREAS, pursuant to the SK Foods Bankruptcy Plan, Class Counsel is in the process
16
of arranging for the pro rata distribution of the Escrow Account Funds to Class members in
17
accordance with the plan of allocation approved by this Court, subject to the fees awarded to
18
Class Counsel by the bankruptcy court; and
19
WHEREAS, the claims administrator anticipates the claims distribution process to take up
20
to approximately six months to complete, depending on how many uncashed checks remain at the
21
initial 90-day void date, and the response the claims administrator receives from outreach to the
22
class members with uncashed checks; and
23
WHEREAS, the Court has a Status Conference scheduled for March 5, 2020;
24
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, subject to this Court's approval, that the
25
March 5, 2020 status conference be continued until September 10, 2020, or any other date
26
convenient for the Court, to address status of the final distributions to the Class and the closing of
27
this action.
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
-3-
CASE NO. 08-CV-3017
1
DATED: February 27, 2020
By:
DATED: February 27, 2020
By: /s/ Steig Olson (as authorized on 2/27/20)
Stephen R. Neuwirth
Steig Olson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: (212) 849-7000
Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
stephenneuwirth@quinnemanuel.com
steigolson@quinnemanuel.com
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
/s/ Arthur N. Bailey, Jr.
Michael P. Lehmann
Arthur N. Bailey, Jr.
HAUSFELD LLP
600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 633-1908
Facsimile: (415) 358-4980
mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
abailey@hausfeldllp.com
Class Counsel
14
15
DATED: February 27, 2020
By:
16
17
18
/s/ Malcolm Segal (as authorized on 2/26/20)
Malcolm Segal
SEGAL & ASSOCIATES LLP
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2550
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 446-0886
msegal@segal-pc.com
Attorneys for Defendant Scott Salyer
19
20
21
DATED: February 27, 2020
22
23
24
25
By:
/s/ Gregory C. Nuti (as authorized on 2/26/20)
Gregory C. Nuti
Kevin W. Coleman
NUTI HART LLP
411 30th Street, Suite 408
Oakland, CA 94609
Telephone: (510) 506-7152
gnuti@nutihart.com
kcoleman@nutihart.com
Attorneys for Bradley D. Sharp, Chapter 11 Trustee for
SK Foods, LP
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
-4-
CASE NO. 08-CV-3017
ORDER
1
2
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
3
The March 5, 2020 status conference shall be continued until September 24, 2020 to
4
address the status of the distributions to the Class and the closing of this action.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED: February 28, 2020.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
-5-
CASE NO. 08-CV-3017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?