Four in One Company, Inc. v. SK Foods, L.P. et al

Filing 293

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/28/2020 CONTINUING the Status Conference to 9/24/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, to address the status of the distributions to the Class and the closing of this action. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
5 Michael P. Lehmann Arthur N. Bailey, Jr. HAUSFELD LLP 600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 633-1908 Facsimile: (415) 358-4980 mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com abailey@hausfeldllp.com 6 Class Counsel 7 [Additional counsel on signature page] 1 2 3 4 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 FOUR IN ONE COMPANY, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, Case No. 08-cv-3017 KJM EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE v. SK FOODS, L.P., INGOMAR PACKING COMPANY, LOS GATOS TOMATO PRODUCTS, SCOTT SALYER, STUART WOOLF and GREG PRUETT, Date: Time: Place: Judge: March 5, 2019 2:30 p.m. Courtroom 3 Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, on September 16, 2014, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California entered an order confirming the "Second Amended Joint Plan of Liquidation of SK Foods, LP and its Substantively Consolidated Affiliates (July 16, 2014)" [Dkt. No. 4980] (the "SK Foods Bankruptcy Plan") in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy action filed by Defendant SK Foods, L.P. (Case No. 09-29162-D-11); and WHEREAS, Class counsel has informed undersigned counsel for Scott Salyer of the following facts relating to SK Foods bankruptcy proceedings; and 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER -1- CASE NO. 08-CV-3017 1 WEREAS, all funds from the Class settlements with Ingomar Packing Company, Los 2 Gatos Tomato Products, Stuart Woolf and Greg Pruett have been paid and distributed to the Class 3 and Final Judgment has been entered as to these Defendants in the consolidated cases Four in 4 One Company v. SF Foods, LP, et al. (Case No. 2:08-cv-03017-KJM-EFB), Diversified Foods 5 and Seasoning, Inc. v. SK Foods, et al. (Case No. 2:08-cv-03074 KJM-EFB), Bruce Foods 6 Corporation v. SK Foods, LP, et al. (Case No. 2:09-cv-00027-KJM-EFB), and Cliffstar 7 Corporation v. SK Foods, LP, et al. (Case No. 2:09-cv-00442-KJM-EFB) (the “Consolidated 8 Cases”); and 9 WHEREAS a portion of the funds previously recovered through the SK Foods bankruptcy 10 action have been paid and distributed to the Class in the Consolidated Cases, and the only 11 potential source of further distributions to the Class are additional funds recovered pursuant to the 12 SK Foods Bankruptcy Plan in the bankruptcy action; and 13 WHEREAS, Defendant SK Foods had affiliated companies in Australia, including SK 14 Foods Australia Pty Ltd., (“SKFA”) which were liquidated; and the liquidators of SKFA did not 15 follow proper procedures in paying themselves approximately five million seven hundred 16 thousand Australian dollars (“AUD”) from the liquidation thereby requiring the liquidators to file 17 an application for approval of remuneration with the Federal Court of Australia; and 18 WHEREAS, on February 12, 2019, the Federal Court of Australia issued a ruling on the 19 liquidators’ remuneration application providing for a reduction in their allowed compensation, 20 and on June 12, 2019, issued an order regarding implementation of the reduction and providing 21 that the liquidators will have to refund approximately AUD$1.9 million, plus interest, or around 22 AUD$2.7 million; and 23 WHEREAS, the Chapter 11 Trustee informed Class Counsel that the liquidators repaid 24 AUD$2.7 million to SKFA and affiliated companies, and that ninety (90%) percent of the funds 25 refunded by the liquidators (less currency conversion fees) have been paid to the Trustee; and that 26 the Trustee was preparing for distribution to unsecured creditors pursuant to the SK Foods 27 Bankruptcy Plan, an amount of approximately USD$1.6 million (90% of the AUD$2.7 at the 28 estimated exchange rate); and STIPULATION AND ORDER -2- CASE NO. 08-CV-3017 1 WHEREAS, The Chapter 11 Trustee has informed Class Counsel that, in addition to the 2 Australian funds, the Trustee was preparing approximately $3.4 million to distribute resulting in 3 total distribution of approximately $5 million to the unsecured creditors; and 4 WHEREAS, on January 13, 2020, the Chapter 11 Trustee mailed a check to the escrow 5 agent of Class Counsel for $306,954.36, an amount representing the second distribution to the 6 Class of the Allowed General Unsecured Claim Amount of $10.6 million based on a distribution 7 rate of 2.895796%, which was deposited into the escrow account for this case held by Class 8 Counsel (the “Escrow Account Funds”); and 9 WHEREAS, the Chapter 11 Trusted has informed Class Counsel that as of approximately 10 January 16, 2020, the Trustee has made final distributions of bankruptcy funds to unsecured 11 creditors and the Class, but anticipates some uncashed checks and returned mail, which under the 12 plan and trust agreement the Trustee must wait 90 days for those checks to settle out, after which 13 time the Trustee will file a motion to address any unclaimed funds or redistributions, if needed, 14 and close the case; and 15 WHEREAS, pursuant to the SK Foods Bankruptcy Plan, Class Counsel is in the process 16 of arranging for the pro rata distribution of the Escrow Account Funds to Class members in 17 accordance with the plan of allocation approved by this Court, subject to the fees awarded to 18 Class Counsel by the bankruptcy court; and 19 WHEREAS, the claims administrator anticipates the claims distribution process to take up 20 to approximately six months to complete, depending on how many uncashed checks remain at the 21 initial 90-day void date, and the response the claims administrator receives from outreach to the 22 class members with uncashed checks; and 23 WHEREAS, the Court has a Status Conference scheduled for March 5, 2020; 24 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, subject to this Court's approval, that the 25 March 5, 2020 status conference be continued until September 10, 2020, or any other date 26 convenient for the Court, to address status of the final distributions to the Class and the closing of 27 this action. 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER -3- CASE NO. 08-CV-3017 1 DATED: February 27, 2020 By: DATED: February 27, 2020 By: /s/ Steig Olson (as authorized on 2/27/20) Stephen R. Neuwirth Steig Olson QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 Facsimile: (212) 849-7100 stephenneuwirth@quinnemanuel.com steigolson@quinnemanuel.com 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 /s/ Arthur N. Bailey, Jr. Michael P. Lehmann Arthur N. Bailey, Jr. HAUSFELD LLP 600 Montgomery Street, Suite 3200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 633-1908 Facsimile: (415) 358-4980 mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com abailey@hausfeldllp.com Class Counsel 14 15 DATED: February 27, 2020 By: 16 17 18 /s/ Malcolm Segal (as authorized on 2/26/20) Malcolm Segal SEGAL & ASSOCIATES LLP 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2550 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 446-0886 msegal@segal-pc.com Attorneys for Defendant Scott Salyer 19 20 21 DATED: February 27, 2020 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ Gregory C. Nuti (as authorized on 2/26/20) Gregory C. Nuti Kevin W. Coleman NUTI HART LLP 411 30th Street, Suite 408 Oakland, CA 94609 Telephone: (510) 506-7152 gnuti@nutihart.com kcoleman@nutihart.com Attorneys for Bradley D. Sharp, Chapter 11 Trustee for SK Foods, LP 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER -4- CASE NO. 08-CV-3017 ORDER 1 2 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 3 The March 5, 2020 status conference shall be continued until September 24, 2020 to 4 address the status of the distributions to the Class and the closing of this action. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: February 28, 2020. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER -5- CASE NO. 08-CV-3017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?