Jacla v. Solano County Sheriff et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/5/09 ORDERING that Plaintiffs application to proceed IFP is DISMISSED without prejudice; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed IFP; and Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, acompleted application to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by this district. Use of the form assists plaintiff to establish and the court to evaluate plaintiff's in forma pauperis status in light of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (b)(1) and (2). Accordingly, plaintiff's application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. ///// ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREW STANLEY JACLA, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-3049 JFM (PC)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
/mp/001 jacl3049.3djfm

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is dismissed without prejudice; 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. DATED: January 5, 2009.

2