Ximenez v. Adams et al
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/2/11 GRANTING 45 Motion for Extension. Respondent filed the requested response. Accordingly, this matter is now ripe for decision, and this court will now rule on the petition. (Donati, J)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHRISTOPHER JAMES XIMENEZ,
Case No. 2:08-cv-03056-JKS
Petitioner,
vs.
ORDER
DERRELL G. ADAMS, Warden,
Respondent.
At Docket No. 44, this Court ordered the Respondent to file a brief informing this Court
of its preliminary position regarding whether Ximenez was represented by counsel during the
1997 proceeding and whether Ximenez would face any foreseeable problems in obtaining the
records for his 1997 case. At Docket No. 45 the Respondent filed a motion for a one-week
extension of time to comply with the order, however before this Court had the opportunity to
rule on the order, the Respondent filed the requested response. Therefore, the Respondent’s
motion at Docket No. 45 is GRANTED.
Ximenez has still not submitted documentation that he was denied counsel during the
1997 proceedings. This Court has granted Ximenez two extensions of time and informed him
that he would receive no more extensions—in his motions for extensions of time, Ximenez set
his own deadlines, which this Court adopted. Ximenez has twice failed to meet these deadlines.
Accordingly, this matter is now ripe for decision, and this Court will now rule on the petition.
Dated: September 2, 2011.
/s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.
JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?