Gorton v. Todd et al

Filing 151

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/1/2012 ORDERING Plaintiffs claims against defendants Kelly Martinez, R.N., Boru Nale, M.D., Karen Todd, P.A., B. Williams, M.D.,and Christopher Smith, M.D. are hereby dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the Stipulation.(Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dean A. Morehous (SBN: 111841) dmorehous@winston.com Nicholas W. Short (SBN: 253922) nshort@winston.com Jocelyn M. Wang (SBN: 267937) jmwang@winston.com Winston & Strawn LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CHARLES ROBERT GORTON 8 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 Winston & Strawn LLP 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 CHARLES ROBERT GORTON 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, v. TODD, et al. Defendants. 18 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:08-CV-03069-LKK-GGH (PC) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF K. MARTINEZ, R.N.; B. NALE, M.D.; K. TODD, P.A.; B. WILLIAMS, M.D.; AND C. SMITH, M.D. The Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton Amended Complaint Filed: February 26, 2009 Trial Date: February 20, 2013 20 The Court hereby GRANTS the parties’ Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal of K. Martinez, 21 R.N.; B. Nale, M.D.; K. Todd, M.D.; and C. Smith, M.D. (the “Stipulation”). Plaintiff’s claims 22 against defendants Kelly Martinez, R.N., Boru Nale, M.D., Karen Todd, P.A., B. Williams, M.D., 23 and Christopher Smith, M.D. are hereby dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the terms of 24 the Stipulation. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: August 1, 2012. 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF K. MARTINEZ, R.N., B. NALE, M.D., ET AL. CASE NO. 2:08:-CV-03069-LKK-GGH (PC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?