Diversified Foods and Seasonings, Inc. v. SK Foods LP et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 01/27/09 GRANTING 30 Stipulation Re: Accepting service of Process of Complaint and Extending Date For Response. IT IS ORDERED that the time for Intramark and Rahal to respond to the Complaint is extended to March 2, 2009.(Streeter, J) Modified on 1/29/2009 (Streeter, J).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. 199643) Andrew S. Kingsdale (State Bar No. 255669) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, Ste 3000 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 [phone] Counsel for Plaintiff Diversified Foods and Seasonings, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SACRAMENTO DIVISION) DIVERSIFIED FOODS AND SEASONINGS, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SK FOODS L.P., INTRAMARK USA, INC., and RANDALL LEE RAHAL, Defendants. Case No. 2:08-cv-03074-MCE-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: ACCEPTING SERVICE OF PROCESS OF COMPLAINT AND EXTENDING DATE FOR RESPONSE

WHEREAS, on December 18, 2008, Plaintiff Diversified Foods and Seasonings, Inc. ("Diversified") filed a Class Action Complaint ("Complaint") in the above-captioned action; and, WHEREAS, this is the first extension requested by parties to this action; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Diversified and Defendants Intramark USA, Inc. ("Intramark") and Randall Lee Rahal ("Rahal") as follows: 1. Christopher D. Adams, attorney of record for Intramark and Rahal, shall accept

service of process on behalf of Intramark and Rahal of the Complaint. 2. The time for Intramark and Rahal to respond to the Complaint is extended to

March 2, 2009. 3. In the event Intramark or Rahal responds to a complaint in any related case before -1-

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

March 2, 2009, then that Defendant also shall respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned action on that earlier date. 4. In the event Intramark or Rahal produce any documents, electronic data, or other

information to any plaintiff in any civil related case, then that Defendant shall make such information immediately available to Plaintiff Diversified on the same terms and subject to the same conditions. SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. Dated: January 23, 2009 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP by: /s/ Joseph R. Saveri Joseph R. Saveri

Joseph R. Saveri (State Bar No. 130064) Eric B. Fastiff (State Bar No. 182260) Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. 199643) Andrew S. Kingsdale (State Bar No. 255669) Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery St., Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: [phone] Counsel for Plaintiff Diversified Foods and Seasonings, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Dated: January 23, 2009 WALDER, HAYDEN & BROGAN by: /s/ Christopher D. Adams (as authorized on 1/23/09) Christopher D. Adams Christopher D. Adams 5 Becker Farm Road, Suite 3 Roseland, NJ 07068 Telephone: [phone] Counsel for Defendants Randall Lee Rahal and Intramark USA, Inc. ORDER DATED: January 27, 2009 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-2PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com