Castillo v. Solano County Jail, et al
Filing
59
ORDER denying 55 Motion to Compel further discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/04/10. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
(PC) Castillo v. Solano County Jail, et al
Doc. 59
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. / On October 6, 2010, this court directed defendant Marsh to respond to plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery filed October 1, 2010. Marsh timely responded, stating that he subsequently provided supplemental responses to the two requests pursued by plaintiff, viz., Plaintiff's Request for Admission No. 6, and Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 1. Review of plaintiff's arguments concerning the relevance of the further information sought, and review of the content of defendant's supplemental responses, indicates that no further matters remain in dispute. This conclusion is buttressed by plaintiff declining to file a reply to defendant's response, although given the opportunity. //// //// //// ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA REYNALDO J. CASTILLO, Plaintiff, No. 2:08-cv-3080 GEB KJN P
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
cast3080.disc.frthr
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery (Dkt. No. 55) is denied as moot. SO ORDERED. DATED: November 4, 2010
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
