Castillo v. Solano County Jail, et al

Filing 85

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/19/12 ordering the timed identified in the court's order dated 05/21/12 requiring that a joint status report be filed by 06/21/12 is now extended by 60 days so that the joint status report is now due on 08/21/12. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 REYNALDO J. CASTILLO, Case No. 2:08-CV-03080 GEB KJN P 9 Plaintiff, 10 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES’ JOINT STATUS REPORT SUBMISSION DEADLINE 11 vs. 12 SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al., 13 Defendants. ________________________________ 14 15 16 Plaintiff Reynaldo Castillo (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and defendants Ravinder Kadevari, M.D., and Chris Pilaczynski (“Defendants”), by and through 17 18 their undersigned counsel, Jerome Varanini (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby agree and 19 stipulate to the following: 20 21 1. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel was appointed by the Court on January 4, 2012, after discovery was closed; 22 23 2. WHEREAS, Parties have conferred and counsel has agreed that a 60-day 24 extension of time to submit a joint status conference statement would be in the best interest 25 of the case; 26 3. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has had a difficult time ascertaining what 27 28 discovery has been propounded and responded to as a result of the Plaintiff’s misplacement 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION 1 or destruction of parts of the file; and, has had difficulties obtaining documents directly from 2 plaintiff; 3 4. WHEREAS, Parties’ counsel are working together to ensure that Plaintiff’s 4 5 counsel is in possession of all pertinent documentation, including all medical records 6 available so that this matter may be evaluated to determine the necessity of the retention of 7 medical expert(s) and/or the possibility of resolution of this matter in order to spare the 8 expense involved in prolonged litigation; 9 5. WHEREAS, a tragedy in the Plaintiff’s counsel’s family will require significant 10 11 time out of the office and the demands of Plaintiff’s law practice have been extraordinary; 12 6. WHEREAS, the recent court order dated May 21, 2012 has required the 13 submission of a Joint Status Report to the Court by June 21, 2012; 14 7. WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant an extension of 15 16 time to submit a joint status report to August 21, 2012, or at time that the Court deems 17 reasonable. 18 8. WHEREAS, this is the first extension requested by Plaintiff. 19 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 20 The time identified in the Court’s Order dated May 21, 2012 requiring that a joint 21 22 status report be filed by June 21, 2012, is now extended by sixty (60) days, so that the joint 23 status report is now due on August 21, 2012. 24 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 Dated: June 20, 2012 COLDERBANK LAW 4 By: Tania H. Colderbank Tania H. Colderbank, Attorney for plaintiff Reynaldo Castillo 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 20, 2012 9 TRIMBLE SHERINIAN & VARANINI By: [signature provided in Dkt. No. 84 at 3] Jerome Varanini, Attorney for defendants Ravinder Kadevari, M.D., and Chris Pilaczynski 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Date: 6/19/2012 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 DEAC_Signature-E ND: ad4mc0d 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?