Castillo v. Solano County Jail, et al
Filing
85
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/19/12 ordering the timed identified in the court's order dated 05/21/12 requiring that a joint status report be filed by 06/21/12 is now extended by 60 days so that the joint status report is now due on 08/21/12. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
REYNALDO J. CASTILLO,
Case No. 2:08-CV-03080 GEB KJN P
9
Plaintiff,
10
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR PARTIES’ JOINT STATUS
REPORT SUBMISSION DEADLINE
11
vs.
12
SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
13
Defendants.
________________________________
14
15
16
Plaintiff Reynaldo Castillo (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and
defendants Ravinder Kadevari, M.D., and Chris Pilaczynski (“Defendants”), by and through
17
18
their undersigned counsel, Jerome Varanini (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby agree and
19
stipulate to the following:
20
21
1. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel was appointed by the Court on January 4, 2012,
after discovery was closed;
22
23
2. WHEREAS, Parties have conferred and counsel has agreed that a 60-day
24
extension of time to submit a joint status conference statement would be in the best interest
25
of the case;
26
3. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has had a difficult time ascertaining what
27
28
discovery has been propounded and responded to as a result of the Plaintiff’s misplacement
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
1
or destruction of parts of the file; and, has had difficulties obtaining documents directly from
2
plaintiff;
3
4. WHEREAS, Parties’ counsel are working together to ensure that Plaintiff’s
4
5
counsel is in possession of all pertinent documentation, including all medical records
6
available so that this matter may be evaluated to determine the necessity of the retention of
7
medical expert(s) and/or the possibility of resolution of this matter in order to spare the
8
expense involved in prolonged litigation;
9
5. WHEREAS, a tragedy in the Plaintiff’s counsel’s family will require significant
10
11
time out of the office and the demands of Plaintiff’s law practice have been extraordinary;
12
6. WHEREAS, the recent court order dated May 21, 2012 has required the
13
submission of a Joint Status Report to the Court by June 21, 2012;
14
7. WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant an extension of
15
16
time to submit a joint status report to August 21, 2012, or at time that the Court deems
17
reasonable.
18
8. WHEREAS, this is the first extension requested by Plaintiff.
19
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
20
The time identified in the Court’s Order dated May 21, 2012 requiring that a joint
21
22
status report be filed by June 21, 2012, is now extended by sixty (60) days, so that the joint
23
status report is now due on August 21, 2012.
24
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3
Dated: June 20, 2012
COLDERBANK LAW
4
By: Tania H. Colderbank
Tania H. Colderbank, Attorney for plaintiff
Reynaldo Castillo
5
6
7
8
Dated: June 20, 2012
9
TRIMBLE SHERINIAN & VARANINI
By: [signature provided in Dkt. No. 84 at 3]
Jerome Varanini, Attorney for defendants
Ravinder Kadevari, M.D., and Chris Pilaczynski
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Date: 6/19/2012
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
DEAC_Signature-E ND:
ad4mc0d
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?