Castillo v. Solano County Jail, et al
Filing
88
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/2012, and agreed between the parties to EXTEND the time to file a joint status report to 10/2/2012. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
Tania H. Colderbank, Bar No. 213675
COLDERBANK LAW
112 J Street, Suite 301
Sacramento, California 95814
Phone: (916) 440-0236
Facsimile: (916) 822-5859
E-mail: tania@colderbanklaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff Reynaldo J.
Castillo
6
7
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
REYNALDO J. CASTILLO,
Case No. 2:08-CV-03080 GEB KJN P
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
16
SECOND STIPULATION AND
PROPOSED ORDER RE
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
PARTIES’ JOINT STATUS REPORT
SUBMISSION DEADLINE
SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff Reynaldo Castillo (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned counsel, and
22
defendants Ravinder Kadevari, M.D., and Chris Pilaczynski (“Defendants”), by and through
23
their undersigned counsel, Jerome Varanini (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby agree and
24
stipulate to the following:
25
26
27
1. WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel was appointed by the Court on January 4, 2012,
after discovery was closed;
28
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
1
2. WHEREAS, Parties have conferred and counsel has agreed that a 45-day
2
extension of time to submit a joint status conference statement would be in the best interest
3
of the case;
4
3. WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel has experienced delays in scheduling conferences
5
6
due to internal issues at Mule Creek State Prison and will be meeting with Mr. Castillo at
7
Mule Creek State Prison for a legal visit on August 21, 2012;
8
9
10
4. WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel has received on today’s date additional discovery
documentation from Defendant’s counsel that has yet to be reviewed;
5. WHEREAS, the physician has indicated that he will need a minimum of two to
11
12
three weeks once he has received his fees to review the medical records;
13
14
15
6. WHEREAS, this Court’s findings have indicated that the plaintiff must have a
physician to meet his burden of proof; plaintiff’s counsel has spoken with a medical doctor
16
who is board certified in both internal and infectious diseases about the likelihood of Mr.
17
Castillo’s diagnosis and medical causation;
18
7. WHEREAS, plaintiff’s counsel’s request for this Court’s permission to incur fees
19
so that this medical doctor can be formally retained for medical record review and a
20
21
consultation is currently pending;
7. WHEREAS, the recent court order dated June 19, 2012 has required the
22
23
submission of a Joint Status Report to the Court by August 21, 2012;
24
8. WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant an extension of
25
26
time to submit a joint status report to October 2, 2012, or at time that the Court deems
27
reasonable. This the second extension requested by Plaintiff.
28
////
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
1
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
2
The time identified in the Court’s Order dated June 19, 2012 requiring that a joint
3
status report be filed by August 21, 2012, is now extended by forty-five (45) days, so that the
4
5
joint status report is now due on October 2, 2012.
6
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
7
8
Dated: August 23, 2012
COLDERBANK LAW
9
By: /s/Tania H. Colderbank
Tania H. Colderbank, Attorney for plaintiff
Reynaldo Castillo
10
11
12
13
Dated: August 23, 2012
14
TRIMBLE SHERINIAN & VARANINI
By:___/s/Jerome Varanini_______________
Jerome Varanini, Attorney for defendants
Ravinder Kadevari, M.D., and Chris Pilaczynski
15
16
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 8/22/2012
20
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
DEAC_Signature-END:
ad4mc0d
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?