Hartmann v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/28/09 ORDERING that defendants shall file their responsive pleadings on or before 11/23/09. If defendants responsive pleading is a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs shall file their opposition on or before 1/4/10. The parties shall meet and confer and select a mutually-agreeable hearing date that is consistent with the courts law and motion calendar.(Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:9 hart3094.36rp

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHAWNA HARTMANN & CAREN HILL, No. CIV S-08-3094 DAD P vs. CAL. DEP'T CORRS. & REHABILITATION, et al., ORDER / The parties in this action have filed a stipulation to extend the time for defendants to file responsive pleadings in this matter. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall file their responsive pleadings on or before November 23, 2009. If defendants' responsive pleading is a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs shall file their opposition on or before January 4, 2010. The parties shall meet and confer and select a mutually-agreeable hearing date that is consistent with the court's law and motion calendar. DATED: October 28, 2009.