Pandora Jewelry, LLC v. Bello Paradiso, LLC

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/21/09: The reference to "Pandora Jewelry U.S." on line 8 page 2 of the Court's April 2, 2009, Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order is erroneous and should read "Pandora Jewelry A/S, " such that Defendant must serve its counterclaim upon Pandora Jewelry A/S within 75 days from the date of entry of the Scheduling Order. (Kaminski, H)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

HARVEY SISKIND LLP D. Peter Harvey (SBN: 55712) [e-mail] Matthew A. Stratton (SBN: 254080) [e-mail] 4 Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] William R. Hansen (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] Bridget A. Short (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] Bernadette Reilly (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] Thomas J. FitzGerald (admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] LATHROP & GAGE LLP 230 Park Avenue, Suite 1847 New York, NY 10169 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant PANDORA JEWELRY, LLC

John Shaeffer (State Bar No. 138331) [e-mail] Jeffrey Grant (State Bar No. 218974) [e-mail] LATHROP & GAGE LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1000 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO OFFICE PANDORA JEWELRY, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. BELLO PARADISO, LLC, a California limited liability company, and DOES 1-50 Defendants. And Related Counterclaims. Case No. 2:08-cv-03108-LKK-DAD ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR SERVING COUNTERDEFENDANT PANDORA JEWELRY A/S

Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

PDF created with pdfFactory[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR SERVING COUNTERDEFENDANT trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: The reference to "Pandora Jewelry U.S." on line 8 page 2 of the Court's April 2, 2009, Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order is erroneous and should read "Pandora Jewelry A/S," such that Defendant must serve its counterclaim upon Pandora Jewelry A/S within 75 days from the date of entry of the Scheduling Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 21, 2009.

PDF created with pdfFactory [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEADLINE FOR SERVING COUNTERDEFENDANT trial version www.pdffactory.com