Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians v. Caballero

Filing 128

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/16/11, ORDERING that Cesar Caballero shall appear and show cause, why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to comply with the terms of this Court's preliminary injunction order issued on 9/15/10. A Show Cause Hearing is SET for 6/15/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Any responsive pleading to this order to show cause shall be filed and served on or before 6/1/11, and any reply thereto shall be filed and served on or before 6/8/11. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PAULA M. YOST (State Bar No. 156843) paula.yost@snrdenton.com IAN R. BARKER (State Bar No. 240223) ian.barker@snrdenton.com SNR DENTON US LLP 525 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2708 Telephone: (415) 882-5000 Facsimile: (415) 882-0300 Attorneys for Plaintiff SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SNR DENTON US LLP 525 MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 (415) 882-5000 11 12 13 14 15 SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS, CASE NO. 2:08-CV-03133-JAM-DAD Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATING THE COURT’S PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION v. CESAR CABALLERO, Defendant. Date: June 15, 2011 Time: 9:30 a.m. Courtroom: 6 16 17 Judge: 18 Hon. John A. Mendez 19 20 Upon review and consideration of Plaintiff Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians’ 21 (“Tribe”) Application for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not Be Held in 22 Contempt for Violating the Court’s Preliminary Injunction (“Application”), the papers filed in 23 support of the Tribe’s Application, including the declarations of Ian Barker and Yolanda Tayaba, 24 the court file in the above-captioned case, and other good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby, 25 ORDERED that Cesar Caballero shall appear and show cause, if any there is, why he 26 should not be held in contempt for his failure to comply with the terms of this Court’s preliminary 27 injunction order (“Order”) issued on September 15, 2010, directing that “Mr. Caballero may not 28 use, or represent to third parties, including the United States government, that he is associated with -1- PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 or a representative of, the ‘Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians,’ the ‘Shingle Springs 2 Rancheria,’ the ‘Shingle Springs Miwok Tribe,’ the ‘Shingle Springs Miwok Indians,’ or any 3 confusingly similar variation thereof” and that “Mr. Caballero also may not represent that he is 4 associated with, or lives on, the Shingle Springs Rancheria, the sovereign territory and land base 5 that is held in trust by the United States for the Tribe,” 6 ORDERED that a hearing on this order to show cause shall be held before this Court on 7 June 15, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, located at 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, California, 8 95814; and it is further, 9 ORDERED that any responsive pleading to this order to show cause shall be filed and served on or before June 1, 2011 [in consideration of Mr. Caballero’s criminal trial currently set 11 SNR DENTON US LLP 525 MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708 (415) 882-5000 10 before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan of this Court on May 17, 2011, and despite the 12 seriousness of Mr. Caballero’s allegedly contemptuous conduct, the Tribe is amenable to 13 postponing any responsive pleading by Mr. Caballero until May 24, 2011, or sometime thereafter, 14 as is convenient for the Court] and any reply thereto shall be filed and served on or before June 8, 15 2011. 16 17 /s/ John A. Mendez DATED: 5/16/2011 The Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?