Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians v. Caballero
Filing
128
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/16/11, ORDERING that Cesar Caballero shall appear and show cause, why he should not be held in contempt for his failure to comply with the terms of this Court's preliminary injunction order issued on 9/15/10. A Show Cause Hearing is SET for 6/15/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. Any responsive pleading to this order to show cause shall be filed and served on or before 6/1/11, and any reply thereto shall be filed and served on or before 6/8/11. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PAULA M. YOST (State Bar No. 156843)
paula.yost@snrdenton.com
IAN R. BARKER (State Bar No. 240223)
ian.barker@snrdenton.com
SNR DENTON US LLP
525 Market Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2708
Telephone: (415) 882-5000
Facsimile: (415) 882-0300
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
SNR DENTON US LLP
525 MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
11
12
13
14
15
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK
INDIANS,
CASE NO. 2:08-CV-03133-JAM-DAD
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE HELD
IN CONTEMPT FOR VIOLATING
THE COURT’S PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
v.
CESAR CABALLERO,
Defendant.
Date:
June 15, 2011
Time:
9:30 a.m.
Courtroom: 6
16
17
Judge:
18
Hon. John A. Mendez
19
20
Upon review and consideration of Plaintiff Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians’
21
(“Tribe”) Application for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not Be Held in
22
Contempt for Violating the Court’s Preliminary Injunction (“Application”), the papers filed in
23
support of the Tribe’s Application, including the declarations of Ian Barker and Yolanda Tayaba,
24
the court file in the above-captioned case, and other good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby,
25
ORDERED that Cesar Caballero shall appear and show cause, if any there is, why he
26
should not be held in contempt for his failure to comply with the terms of this Court’s preliminary
27
injunction order (“Order”) issued on September 15, 2010, directing that “Mr. Caballero may not
28
use, or represent to third parties, including the United States government, that he is associated with
-1-
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1
or a representative of, the ‘Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians,’ the ‘Shingle Springs
2
Rancheria,’ the ‘Shingle Springs Miwok Tribe,’ the ‘Shingle Springs Miwok Indians,’ or any
3
confusingly similar variation thereof” and that “Mr. Caballero also may not represent that he is
4
associated with, or lives on, the Shingle Springs Rancheria, the sovereign territory and land base
5
that is held in trust by the United States for the Tribe,”
6
ORDERED that a hearing on this order to show cause shall be held before this Court on
7
June 15, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, located at 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, California,
8
95814; and it is further,
9
ORDERED that any responsive pleading to this order to show cause shall be filed and
served on or before June 1, 2011 [in consideration of Mr. Caballero’s criminal trial currently set
11
SNR DENTON US LLP
525 MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94105-2708
(415) 882-5000
10
before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan of this Court on May 17, 2011, and despite the
12
seriousness of Mr. Caballero’s allegedly contemptuous conduct, the Tribe is amenable to
13
postponing any responsive pleading by Mr. Caballero until May 24, 2011, or sometime thereafter,
14
as is convenient for the Court] and any reply thereto shall be filed and served on or before June 8,
15
2011.
16
17
/s/ John A. Mendez
DATED: 5/16/2011
The Honorable John A. Mendez
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?