Mack v. Unknown

Filing 25

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/23/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 22 are ADOPTED IN FULL and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

-EFB (PC) Mack v. Unknown

Doc. 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. TILTON, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 6, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY E. MACK, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-08-3161 KJM EFB P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Rule 110. full; and

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2010, are adopted in

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local

DATED: March 23, 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2