Tunstall v. Knowles, et al

Filing 156

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/12/2011 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 152 are ADOPTED in FULL; Plaintiff's 134 motion for a court order is DENIED; Plaintiff's 138 motion for a court order is DENIED; Plaintiff's 150 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED and Plaintiff's 151 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ROBERT TUNSTALL,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14

vs.
MIKE KNOWLES, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

15
16

No. 2:08-cv-3176 WBS JFM (PC)

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On September 13, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

21

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff

22

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

24

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

25

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

26

by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 13, 2011, are adopted in

3

full;

4

2. Plaintiff’s March 1, 2011 motion for a court order is denied;

5

3. Plaintiff’s April 8, 2011 motion for a court order is denied;

6

4. Plaintiff’s July 1, 2011 motion for injunctive relief is denied; and

7

5. Plaintiff’s July 26, 2011 motion for injunctive relief is denied.

8

DATED: October 12, 2011

9
10
11
12
13
14

/tuns3176.805(4)

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2