Patriot Rail Corp. v. Sierra Railroad Company

Filing 224

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 04/17/12 ORDERING that the Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 12/13/12 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. with a joint pretrial statement due by 11/15/12; tr ial briefs due by 11/28/12; any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by 11/21/12 with oppositions due by 11/28/12 and any reply due by 12/05/12. The motions will be heard by the Court at the same time as the Final Pretrial Conference; Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 02/25/13 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Plaintiff's 219 Motion to Continue is DENIED as moot; the 04/19/12 hearing is VACATED. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRIOT RAIL CORP., 12 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-00009-MCE-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER SIERRA RAILROAD COMPANY, 15 16 17 Defendants. ____________________________/ On the Court’s own motion, the Court makes the following 18 Orders. 19 I. 20 The May 17, 2012 Final Pretrial Conference is vacated and FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 21 continued to December 13, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. 22 least one of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of 23 the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial Conference. 24 reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial 25 attorney is unable to attend, the attorney who attends in place 26 of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the case 27 and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the 28 client. 1 At If by 1 Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial 2 at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference, with no matters 3 remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for 4 oral testimony. 5 The parties shall file, not later than November 15, 2012, a 6 Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement. The provisions of 7 Local Rules 281 shall apply with respect to the matters to be 8 included in the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement. 9 addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the In 10 parties are to provide the Court with a plain, concise statement 11 that identifies every non-discovery motion tendered to the Court 12 and its resolution. 13 modified by this Pretrial Scheduling Order, may be grounds for 14 sanctions. 15 Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as At the time of filing the Joint Final Pretrial Conference 16 Statement, counsel shall also electronically mail to the Court in 17 digital format compatible with Microsoft Word or WordPerfect, the 18 Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement in its entirety 19 including the witness and exhibit lists. 20 be sent to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 21 These documents shall The parties should identify first the core undisputed facts 22 relevant to all claims. The parties should then, in a concise 23 manner, identify those undisputed core facts that are relevant to 24 each claim. 25 manner. 26 disputed facts are properly before the Court for trial, they 27 should nevertheless list all disputed facts asserted by each 28 party. The disputed facts should be identified in the same Where the parties are unable to agree as to what 2 1 Each disputed fact or undisputed fact should be separately 2 numbered or lettered. 3 Each party shall identify and concisely list each disputed 4 evidentiary issue which will be the subject of a motion in 5 limine. 6 Each party shall identify the points of law which concisely 7 describe the legal issues of the trial which will be discussed in 8 the parties’ respective trial briefs. 9 reflect issues derived from the core undisputed and disputed 10 facts. 11 Points of law should any point of law. 12 Parties shall not include argument or authorities with The parties shall prepare a joint statement of the case in 13 plain concise language which will be read to the jury at the 14 beginning of the trial. 15 inform the jury what the case is about. 16 The purpose of the joint statement is to The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 17 they are required to list in the Joint Final Pretrial Conference 18 Statement all witnesses and exhibits they propose to offer at 19 trial. 20 a brief statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. 21 The parties may file a joint list or each party may file separate 22 lists. 23 Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement itself, but shall be 24 attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final 25 Pretrial Order. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// After the name of each witness, each party shall provide These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the 3 1 Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. 2 Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. The parties 3 shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the Court 4 Clerk’s Office: pink for plaintiff and blue for defendant. 5 the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be 6 marked “AA-ZZ” and “AAA-ZZZ” etc. 7 number of letters in parenthesis (i.e., “AAAA(4)”) to reduce 8 confusion at trial. 9 otherwise fastened together and each page within the exhibit In After three letters, note the All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or 10 shall be numbered. 11 The list of exhibits shall not include excerpts of depositions, 12 which may be used to impeach witnesses. 13 Plaintiff and Defendant offer the same exhibit during trial, that 14 exhibit shall be referred to by the designation the exhibit is 15 first identified. 16 attention to this detail so that all concerned, including the 17 jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with 18 both a number and a letter. 19 All photographs shall be marked individually. In the event that The Court cautions the parties to pay The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard 20 for the offering at trial of witnesses and exhibits not listed in 21 the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the 22 standard will be strictly applied. 23 listing of exhibits or witnesses that a party does not intend to 24 offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 4 On the other hand, the 1 The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of 2 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the 3 Final Pretrial Conference to aid the Court in: (a) the 4 formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of 5 frivolous claims or defenses; (b) the settling of facts that 6 should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary 7 proof and cumulative evidence. 8 prepare the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement and 9 participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with Counsel must cooperatively 10 these aims in mind. A failure to do so may result in the 11 imposition of sanctions which may include monetary sanctions, 12 orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or 13 such other sanctions as the Court deems appropriate. 14 VIII. TRIAL BRIEFS 15 The parties shall file trial briefs not later than 16 November 28, 2012. 17 regarding the content of trial briefs. Counsel are directed to Local Rule 285 18 IX. EVIDENTIARY AND/OR PROCEDURAL MOTIONS 19 Any evidentiary or procedural motions are to be filed by 20 November 21, 2012. Oppositions must be filed by November 28, 21 2012 and any reply must be filed by December 5, 2012. 22 motions will be heard by the Court at the same time as the Final 23 Pretrial Conference. The 24 X. TRIAL SETTING 25 The July 16, 2012 jury trial is vacated and continued to 26 February 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7. 27 jury. 28 estimate a trial length of fifteen (15) days. Trial will be by The panel will consist of eight (8) jurors. 5 The parties 1 XI. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 2 At the Final Pretrial Conference, the Court may set a 3 settlement conference if the parties so request. 4 settlement conference is requested, the parties are free to 5 continue to mediate or attempt to settle the case with the 6 understanding that the trial date is a firm date. 7 In the event no In the event a settlement conference is set by the Court, 8 counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement 9 authority present at the Settlement Conference or to be fully 10 authorized to settle the matter on any terms. 11 calendar days before the settlement conference, counsel for each 12 party shall submit to the chambers of the settlement judge a 13 confidential Settlement Conference Statement. 14 are neither to be filed with the Clerk nor served on opposing 15 counsel. 16 parties that the statement has been submitted. 17 judge is not the trial judge, the Settlement Conference Statement 18 shall not be disclosed to the trial judge. 19 At least seven (7) Such statements Each party, however, shall serve notice on all other If the settlement Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties may request a 20 settlement conference prior to the Final Pretrial Conference if 21 they feel it would lead to the possible resolution of the case. 22 In the event an early settlement conference date is requested, 23 the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing. 24 The request must state whether the parties waive 25 disqualification, pursuant to Local Rule 270(b), before a 26 settlement judge can be assigned to the case. 27 /// 28 /// 6 1 Absent the parties’ affirmatively requesting that the assigned 2 Judge or Magistrate Judge participate in the settlement 3 conference AND waiver, pursuant to Local Rule 270(b), a 4 settlement judge will be randomly assigned to the case. 5 XII. OTHER 6 Pursuant to this Order, the Plaintiff’s Motion to Continue 7 Trial (ECF No. 219) is denied as moot. 8 April 19, 2012 motion hearing is vacated. 9 10 Accordingly, the IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 17, 2012 11 12 13 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?