- Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Filing 167

PROPOSED ORDER on Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time. (Morazzini, Zackery)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated:_________ SO ORDERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM, et al., 2:09-cv-00058-MCE-DAD v. Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STATE DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME DEBRA BOWEN, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. Good cause appearing, the State Defendants' ex parte application to shorten time to be heard on their Rule 56(f) Motion is hereby GRANTED. The State Defendants' rule 56(f) motion is to be filed no later than June 10, 2009, by 4:00 p.m. PST. Any opposition thereto must be filed by no later than June ___, by 4:00 p.m. PST. Any reply must be filed by no later than June ___, by 4:00 p.m. PST. Hearing on the motion is set for June ___, at _____ a.m. /p.m. PST, in Courtroom 7. ____________________ Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge 1 (2:09-cv-00058-MCE-DAD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?