ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Filing 183

STATEMENT of Non-Opposition to Rule 56(f) Motion filed by defendant Jan Scully. (Cassidy, Terence) Modified on 6/17/2009 (Marciel, M).

ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Doc. 183

1
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

2 3 4 5 6 7

Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180 Kristina M. Hall, SBN 196794 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: [phone] FAX: [phone]

A tto rn e ys for Defendants JAN SCULLY, in her official capacity U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PORTER * SCOTT
ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SAC RAM EN T O , C A 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6

PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL; N A T I O N A L ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE CALIFORNIA - YES ON 8, SPONSORED BY NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE, JOHN DOE #1, an individual and as representative of the CLASS OF MAJOR DONORS, Plaintiffs, vs. DEBRA BOWEN, Secretary of State for the State of California, in her official capacity; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Attorney General for the State of California, in his official capacity; DEAN C. LOGAN, Registrar-Recorder of Los Angeles County, C al i fo rn ia, in his official capacity; DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS - CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; JAN SCULLY, District Attorney for Sacramento County, California in her official capacity and as a representative of the Class of District Attorneys in the State of California; DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney for the City and County of San Francisco, California, in his official capacity and as a representative of the Class of Elected City Attorneys in the State of California; ROSS JOHNSON, TIMOTHY HODSON, EUGENE HUGUENIN, JR., ROBERT LEIDIGH and RAY REMY, members of the California Fair Political Practices Commision, in their official capacities, Defendants. / 1

C a s e No. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD D E F E N D A N T 'S STATEMENT OF NO O P P O S I T I O N TO RULE 56(f) MOTION F I L E D BY CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL

DEFENDANT JAN SCULLY'S STATEMENT OF NO OPPOSITION 00692769.WPD

w w w . p o r ter s c o t t . c o m

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6

D e f e n d a n t JAN SCULLY hereby states that she has no opposition to the Motion of th e California Attorney General and the State Defendants herein pursuant to Federal Rule of C iv il Procedure 56(f). R e s p e c tf u lly submitted, D a te d : June 16, 2009 P O R T E R SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

By 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PORTER * SCOTT
ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SAC RAM EN T O , C A 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6

/s/Terence J. Cassidy Terence J. Cassidy A tto rn e y for Defendant J A N SCULLY, District Attorney for S a c ra m e n to County, California in her o f f ic ia l capacity

2
DEFENDANT JAN SCULLY'S STATEMENT OF NO OPPOSITION 00692769.WPD

w w w . p o r ter s c o t t . c o m