ProtectMarriage.com - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Filing 232

NOTICE of WITHDRAWAL: attorney Sarah E. Troupis, PHV is terminated. (Bieniek, Scott) Modified on 9/29/2010 (Marciel, M).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James Bopp, Jr. (Ind. State Bar No. 2838-84)* Richard E. Coleson (Ind. State Bar No. 11527-70)* Barry A. Bostrom (Ind. State Bar No.11912-84)* Scott F. Bieniek (Ill. State Bar No. 6295901)* BOPP, COLESON & BOSTROM 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510 Telephone: (812) 232-2434 Facsimile: (812) 235-3685 Counsel for Plaintiffs Benjamin W. Bull (AZ Bar No. 009940)* ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND 15100 North 90th Street Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 Telephone: (480) 444-0020 Facsimile: (480) 444-0028 Counsel for Plaintiffs Timothy D. Chandler (Cal. State Bar No. 234325)** ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100 Folsom, CA 95630 Telephone: (916) 932-2850 Facsimile: (916) 932-2851 Counsel for Plaintiffs * Admitted Pro Hac Vice ** Designated Counsel for Service United States District Court Eastern District of California Sacramento Division ProtectMarriage.com, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Debra Bowen, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD Notice of Withdrawal Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. 1 Notice of Withdrawal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sarah E. Troupis, counsel for Plaintiffs, respectfully notes this Notice of Withdrawal. In support, Ms. Troupis states as follows: 1. On January 15, 2009, Ms. Troupis was granted admission to appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiffs in the above-captioned case. 2. On August 31, 2010, Ms. Troupis discontinued her employment with Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom and will begin employment elsewhere. 3. Because Plaintiffs secured Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom as counsel, Ms. Troupis will no longer be able to offer Plaintiffs legal counsel. Please remove her name from counsel lists and email distribution lists. Respectfully Submitted this 28th day of September, 2010. /s/Sarah Troupis Sarah Troupis, Wis. #1061515 By, s/ Scott F. Bieniek James Bopp, Jr. (Ind. Bar No. 2838-84) Barry A. Bostrom (Ind. Bar No.11912-84) Scott F. Bieniek (Ill. Bar No. 6295901) BOPP, COLESON & BOSTROM 1 South Sixth Street Terre Haute, IN 47807-3510 Counsel for Plaintiffs Benjamin W. Bull (Ariz. State Bar No. 009940) ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND 15100 North 90th Street Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 Counsel for Plaintiffs Timothy D. Chandler (Cal. Bar No. 234325) ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100 Folsom, CA 95630 Counsel for Plaintiffs Designated Counsel for Service 2 Notice of Withdrawal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 s/ Scott F. Bieniek Scott F. Bieniek Counsel for Plaintiffs Certificate of Service I, Scott F. Bieniek, am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the abovecaptioned action. My business address is 1 South Sixth Street; Terre Haute, Indiana 478073510. On September 28, 2010, I electronically filed the document described as Notice of Witdrawal with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to: Zackery P. Morazzini zackery.morazzini@doj.ca.gov Erin Peth erin.peth@doj.ca.gov Counsel for Defendants Debra Bowen & Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Judy W. Whitehurst jwhitehurst@counsel.lacounty.gov Counsel for Defendant Dean C. Logan Terence J. Cassidy tcassidy@porterscott.com Counsel for Defendant Class of District Attorneys Mollie M. Lee mollie.lee@sfgov.org Andrew N. Shen andrew.shen@sfgov.org Counsel for Defendant Dennis J. Herrera & Defendant Class of Elected Attorneys Lawrence T. Woodlock lwoodlock@fppc.ca.gov Counsel for Defendant Members of the Fair Political Practices Commission I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Indiana that the above is true and correct. Executed this 28th day of September, 2010. 3 Notice of Withdrawal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?