- Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al

Filing 84

PRO HAC VICE ORDER Added attorney Richard E Coleson for - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal, National Organization for Marriage California - Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, John Doe # 1, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/26/09. (Kaminski, H).

Download PDF - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal et al v. Bowen et al Doc. 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION, ECF REGISTRATION AND CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE, PROPOSED ORDER, et al., Plaintiff(s), Case No. 2:09-CV-00058-MCE-DAD v. Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Debra Bowen, et al., Defendant(s). I, Richard E. Coleson , attorney for Plaintiffs - Yes on 8, a Project of California Renewal, National Organization for Marriage California - Yes on 8, Sponsored by National Organization for Marriage, and John Doe #1, an individual, and as a representative of the Class of Major Donors, hereby petition for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice under the provision of Local Rule 83-180(b)(2). I understand and consent to ECF Registration and Electronic Service as detailed below and I have submitted payment in the amount of $180.00 to the Clerk, U.S. District Court. In support of this petition, I state under penalty of perjury that: My business address is: Firm Name: Bopp Coleson & Bostrom Address: City: State: Voice Phone: FAX Phone: Internet E-mail: I reside in City: 1 S. Sixth Street Terre Haute IN (812) 232-2434 (812) 235-3685 Terre Haute State: IN_ (court) ZIP Code: 47807 I was admitted to practice in the on June 8, 1987 Supreme Court of Indiana (date). I am presently in good standing and eligible to practice in said court. I am not currently suspended or disbarred in any other court. I have G / have not G concurrently or within the year preceding this application made a pro hac vice application to this court. (If you have made a pro hac vice application to this court within the last year, list the name and case number of each matter in which an application was made, the date of application and whether granted or denied.) Cal. Pro-Life Council, Inc. v. Randolph, Case No. 2:00-cv-01698-FCD-GGH. (Although my pro hac vice application in this case was made in 2000, the case is ongoing and I wish to bring this to the Court's attention). I hereby designate the following member of the Bar of this Court who is registered for ECF with whom the Court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding the conduct of the case and upon whom electronic notice shall also be served via the court's ECF system: Name: Firm Name: Address: City: State: Timothy D. Chandler Alliance Defense Fund 101 Parkshore Drive, Suite 100 Folsom CA ZIP Code: 95630 Voice Phone: (916) 932-2850 FAX Phone: E-mail: (916) 932-2851 Dated: January 16, 2009 Petitioner: ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2009 ______________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ECF REGISTRATION AND CONSENT TO ELECTRONIC SERVICE Beginning January 3, 2005, all cases filed and pending in the Eastern District of California are subject to electronic filing, service (ECF) and electronic case storage procedures (CM). This form shall be used to register for accounts on the Court's Electronic Case File (ECF) system which permits electronic filing. By submitting this Petition to Appear Pro Hac Vice and ECF Registration Form, I understand: 1. Registration herein is for ECF use only in cases proceeding in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. 2. Each attorney who is wishes to appear in the Eastern District pro hac vice must complete and sign an Attorney Registration Form. An attorney's password issued by the court combined with the attorney's identification (login), serves as and constitutes the attorney signature. Therefore, an attorney/participant must protect and secure the password issued by the court. If there is any reason to suspect the password has been compromised in any way, such as resignation or reassignment of the person with authority to use the password, it is the duty and responsibility of the attorney/participant to immediately notify the court. The court will immediately delete the password from the electronic filing system and issue a new password. 3. Unless an attorney expressly declines to consent (see below) registration as a Filing User constitutes: (1) consent to receive service electronically and waiver of the right to receive service by first class mail pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(D); (2) consent to electronic service and waiver of the right to service by personal service or first class mail pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b)(2)(D). Note: Service of Summons and Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 are not encompassed by electronic service. Waiver of service and notice by first class mail applies to notice of the entry of an order or judgment. Service by electronic means is complete upon transmission of the Notice of Electronic Filing. 4. A user accesses court information via the court's Internet site or through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records ("PACER") Service Center. PACER involves a separate, free registration. Although the court manages the procedures for electronic filing, all electronic public access to case file documents occurs through PACER. A PACER login is required, in addition to, the password issued by the court. To register for PACER, a user must complete the online form or submit a registration form, available on the PACER website ( 5. By this registration, I understand that the specific procedures which control electronic filing can be found in the Local Rules and CM/ECF User's Manual, all of which can be accessed on the Court's website. Please periodically access these Rules and Manual in order to understand electronic filing requirements, and any changes which may be later implemented. Serious and/or sustained failure to abide by those procedures may result in a termination of electronic filing privileges which are a prerequisite to practice in the Eastern District. N o t ic e Regarding Non-Consent to Electronic Service. An attorney m a y expressly forego consenting to s e r v ic e and receipt of filed docum e n ts by electronic service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 ( b ) ( 2 ) ( D ) . This decision not to consent m u s t be by separate docum e n t in writing addressed to the Office o f the Clerk. Parties not consenting to electronic service m u s t serve by the other m e th o d s specified in R u le 5. T h e court strongly urges that all attorneys consent to serve and receive service of filed docum e n ts by m e a n s of electronic service. There is no significant downside to such consent and universal participation in electronic service will benefit all concerned. Failure to consent to electronic service does not r e lie v e attorneys of the obligation to file documents electronically when required to do so or o t h e r w is e abide by CM /E C F procedures.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?