Joshi, et al v. Starbucks Corporation
Filing
113
STIPULATION and ORDER 112 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 2/9/10 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and nontaxable expenses is due by 2/23/10. (Owen, K)
1 JASON H. WILSON (State Bar No. 140269) 2 3 4 5 6 7
EILEEN M. AHERN (State Bar No. 216822) WILLENKEN WILSON LOH & LIEB LLP 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 3850 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 955-8030 Facsimile: (213) 955-9250 E-mail: jwilson@willenken.com eahern@willenken.com STARBUCKS CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 2:09-CV-00095 FCD DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES
8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 10 11 12 13
14 RAKESH JOSHI and PRANIKA 15 16 17 18
JOSHI,
Plaintiffs, vs.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a 19 Washington corporation, and DOES 1 20 through 10, inclusive,
21 22 23 24 25 26 / / / 27 / / / 28
Defendant.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES JOSHI V. STARBUCKS, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00095-FCD-DAD
113881.1
1 Plaintiffs Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi ("Plaintiffs") and defendant Starbucks 2 Corporation ("Starbucks"), through their respective counsel (collectively, the 3 "Parties"), submit the following stipulation: 4
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Acceptance of Starbucks' Federal Rule
5 of Civil Procedure 68 Offer of Judgment on January 12, 2010, which provided that 6 Plaintiffs would provide to this Court a suitable bill of costs and itemizations for 7 reasonable attorney fees; 8 9
WHEREAS this Court entered such judgment on January 12, 2010; WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and Local Rule
10 292(b), Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and related nontaxable expenses 11 originally was due on January 26, 2010; 12
WHEREAS this Court entered the Parties' stipulation and proposed order to
13 extend the deadline for Plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and related nontaxable 14 expenses by fourteen (14) days to February 9, 2010, such that the Parties would have 15 the opportunity to reach an agreement as to the amount of Plaintiffs' attorneys' fees 16 and related nontaxable expenses to be paid by Starbucks without the need for motion 17 practice; 18
WHEREAS the Parties have reached an agreement as to an agreed-upon
19 amount of reasonable attorneys' fees, related nontaxable expenses and costs to be 20 paid by Starbucks, and are currently finalizing a written settlement agreement 21 between the parties; 22
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the deadline for Plaintiffs' motion for
23 attorneys' fees and related nontaxable expenses should be extended by fourteen (14) 24 days such that the Parties have the opportunity to finalize the written settlement 25 agreement without the need for motion practice, 26 27 28
/// ///
STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES JOSHI V. STARBUCKS, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00095-FCD-DAD
113881.1
- 1-
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, by and through
2 their respective attorneys of record, as follows: The time for Plaintiffs to file a 3 motion for attorneys' fees and related nontaxable expenses shall be extended up to 4 and including February 23, 2010. 5 6 Dated: February 8, 2010 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
WILLENKEN WILSON LOH & LIEB, LLP s/Eileen M. Ahern Eileen M. Ahern Attorneys for Defendant Starbucks Corporation
DATED: February 8, 2010
THE LACROIX LAW FIRM, P.C. s/John K. Buche John K. Buche Damian E. LaCroix Attorneys for Plaintiffs Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED.
21 Dated: February 9, 2010 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND RELATED NONTAXABLE EXPENSES JOSHI V. STARBUCKS, CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00095-FCD-DAD
113881.1
_______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
- 2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?