Joshi, et al v. Starbucks Corporation

Filing 53

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 08/12/09. Attorneys John Karl Buche and Damian E. LaCroix (pro hac vice) are SUBSTITUTED in as counsel in place and stead of Karen M. Goodman and Summer Dawn Haro for plfs Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 John Karl Buche (SBN 239477) Sean M. Sullivan (SBN 254372) BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 875 Prospect, Suite 305 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: 858.459.9111 Facsimile: 858.459.9120 jbuche@buchelaw.com ssullivan@buchelaw.com Damian E. LaCroix (SBN (TX) 24027433) The LaCroix Law Firm (pro hac vice applicant) 416 Westheimer Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: 713.623.8200 Facsimile: 713.623.8400 dlacroix@cbl-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, RAKESH JOSHI and PRANIKA JOSHI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) -1- CASE NO. 2:09-cv-00095 FCD DAD ORDER FOR SUSTITUTION OF COUNSEL RAKESH JOSHI and PRANIKA JOSHI, Plaintiffs, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendant. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// /// COME NOW plaintiffs Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi (collectively hereinafter, "Plaintiffs"), by and through undersigned counsel, who request the Court's permission to substitute John Karl Buche and the firm of Buche & Associates, P.C., and Damian E. LaCroix of The LaCroix Law Firm, P.C., 416 Westheimer, Houston, Texas 77002 (pro hac vice applicant) as counsel of record in place of Karen M. Goodman and Summer D. Hare and the firm of Goodman & Associates. Respectfully Submitted, DATED: August 7, 2009 BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. _/s/ John Karl Buche JOHN KARL BUCHE SEAN M. SULLIVAN 875 Prospect, Suite 305 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: 858.812.2840 Facsimile: 858.459.9120 _/s/ Damian E. LaCroix____________ Damian E. LaCroix (SBN (TX) 24027433) The LaCroix Law Firm (pro hac vice applicant) 416 Westheimer Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: 713.623.8200 Facsimile: 713.623.8400 dlacroix@cbl-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, RAKESH JOSHI and PRANIKA JOSH _ -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// Dated: ___________ Dated: ___________ Dated: ___________ SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Plaintiffs Rakesh Joshi and Pranika Joshi (collectively hereinafter "Plaintiffs"), hereby substitute John Karl Buche and the firm of Buche & Associates, P.C., 875 Prospect, Suite 305, La Jolla, California 92037 and Damian E. LaCroix of The LaCroix Law Firm, P.C., 416 Westheimer, Houston, Texas 77002 (pro hac vice applicant), as counsel of record in place and stead of Karen M. Goodman and Summer D. Hare and the firm of Goodman & Associates. _____/s/____________________________________ Rakesh Joshi _____/s/____________________________________ Pranika Joshi We hereby consent to the foregoing substitution: Dated: ___________ _____/s/____________________________________ Karen M. Goodman Summer D. Hare GOODMAN & ASSOCIATES 3840 WATT AVENUE ­ BLDG. A SACRAMENTO, CA 95821-2640 Telephone: (916) 643-0600 _____/s/____________________________________ John Karl Buche Sean M. Sullivan BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 875 Prospect, Suite 305 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: 858.459.9111 ____/s/_____________________________________ Damian E. LaCroix THE LACROIX LAW FIRM, P.C. (PRO HAC VICE APPLICANT) 416 Westheimer Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: 713.623.8200 Facsimile: 713.623.8400 dlacroix@cbl-law.com We hereby accept this substitution: Dated: ___________ -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 12, 2009 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?