Ostrander v. Mortgage Electronic Registration, et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/27/09 ORDERING that The 30 findings and recommendations filed May 5, 2009, are adopted in full. Defendants' 16 motion to dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice and Plaintiff's 23 motion for preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED. (Duong, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. FREMONT INVESTMENT & LOAN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). On May 5, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL OSTRANDER, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0099 JAM KJM PS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
/ostr0099.804

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 5, 2009, are adopted in full; 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted with prejudice; and 3. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief is denied. DATED: July 27, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2