Turner v. Sacramento County Jail

Filing 69

ORDER adopting 60 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL and denying 46 Motion, 51 Motion, 52 Motion, 55 Motion and 56 Motion. Plaintiff's motion for production of documents is denied without prejudice signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 6/23/10. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 11, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAFONZO R. TURNER, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-0117 WBS KJN P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /turn0117.801 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 11, 2010, are adopted in full. 2. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief concerning access to legal materials or access to the prison law library (Dkt. Nos. 46, 51 and 52) are denied without prejudice. 3. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief concerning medical or mental health treatment at California State Prison--L.A. County (Dkt. Nos. 55 and 56) are denied without prejudice. 4. Plaintiff's motion for production of documents is denied without prejudice. DATED: June 23, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?