United States of America v. Real Property Located at 5322 Silouette Court, Elk Grove, California

Filing 32

FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 5/25/2011. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KELLI L. TAYLOR Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2799 5 Attorneys for the United States 2 3 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5322 SILOUETTE COURT, ELK GROVE, CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, APN: 132-1650-051, INCLUDING ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:09-CV-00137 GEB-JFM FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE Pursuant to the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture, the Court finds: 1. This is a civil forfeiture action against certain real 22 property located at 5322 Silouette Court, Elk Grove, California, 23 Sacramento County, APN: 132-1650-051 (hereafter “defendant real 24 property”), and more fully described in Exhibit A, attached hereto 25 and incorporated herein by reference. 26 2. A Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem (hereafter 27 “Complaint”) was filed on January 15, 2009, seeking the forfeiture 28 of the defendant real property, alleging that said property is 1 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 subject to forfeiture to the United States of America pursuant to 2 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7). 3 4 5 3. On February 3, 2009, the defendant real property was posted with a copy of the Complaint and Notice of Complaint. 4. Beginning on April 16, 2009, for at least 30 consecutive 6 days, the United States published Notice of the Forfeiture Action 7 on the official internet government forfeiture site 8 www.forfeiture.gov. 9 8, 2009. 10 5. A Declaration of Publication was filed on June In addition to the Public Notice of Posting having been 11 completed, the United States gave or attempted to give actual 12 notice to the following individuals and entities: 13 a. Maggie Luong 14 b. CTX Mortgage Company, LLC 15 c. MERS 16 d. Chase Home Finance, LLC 17 6. Claimant Maggie Luong filed a verified statement of 18 interest and answer alleging an interest in the defendant real 19 property. 20 21 22 23 24 Based on the above findings, and the files and records of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Court adopts the Stipulation for Final Judgment of Forfeiture entered into by and between the parties to this action. 2. That judgment is hereby entered against claimant Maggie 25 Luong and all other potential claimants who have not filed claims 26 in this action. 27 28 3. Upon entry of this Final Judgment of Forfeiture, claimant Luong agrees to pay to the United States the sum of $40,000.00 (the 2 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 “settlement amount”) as the substitute res in lieu of the defendant 2 real property. 3 payment due by the sentencing date in the parallel criminal case 4 which is currently scheduled for May 13, 2011. 5 settlement amount will be paid in $500.00 monthly payments due by 6 the 5th of each month starting the month after Maggie Luong is 7 sentenced. 8 9 4. The $40,000.00 shall be paid with a $2,500.00 The balance of the Claimant Maggie Luong shall obtain a cashier’s check for the $2,500.00 payment and for the $500.00 payments each month 10 until the $40,000.00 has been paid in full, made payable to the 11 U.S. Marshals Service and shall be sent to the U.S. Attorney’s 12 Office, Attn: Asset Forfeiture Unit, 501 I Street, Suite 10-100, 13 Sacramento, CA 95814. 14 shall be substituted for the defendant real property and forfeited 15 to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7), to be 16 disposed of according to law. 17 5. All right, title, and interest in said funds If the $2,500.00 payment is not received by sentencing and 18 any of the $500.00 payments are not received by the United States 19 by the 5th of each month starting after Maggie Luong is sentenced 20 until the $40,000.00 is paid in full, the U.S. Marshals Service 21 shall be authorized to seize and sell the defendant real property 22 located at 5322 Silouette Court, Elk Grove, California, Sacramento 23 County, APN: 132-1650-051, in the most commercially feasible 24 manner, as soon as reasonably possible, for the maximum price. 25 United States shall receive through escrow the net proceeds up to 26 the balance owing on the $40,000.00, less payments for costs of 27 selling the property, legitimate liens, and taxes that exist on the 28 defendant real property. The Maggie Luong shall receive all remaining 3 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 amounts after payment of costs of sale, legitimate liens, taxes, 2 and repairs or costs incurred by the U.S. Marshals Service. 3 Luong shall maintain the defendant real property in the same 4 condition and repair as existed as of January 20, 2009, normal wear 5 and tear excepted, until she has paid the settlement amount, or 6 vacated the premises. 7 6. Maggie Within thirty (30) days of full payment of the 8 settlement amount, the United States shall record a withdrawal of 9 lis pendens against the defendant real property. 10 7. That the United States and its servants, agents, and 11 employees and all other public entities, their servants, agents, 12 and employees, are released from any and all liability arising out 13 of or in any way connected with the filing of the Complaint and the 14 posting of the defendant real property with the Complaint and 15 Notice of Complaint. 16 all unknown and unanticipated injuries, and/or damages arising out 17 of the filing of the Complaint and the posting of the defendant 18 real property with the Complaint and Notice of Complaint, as well 19 as to those now known or disclosed. 20 provisions of California Civil Code § 1542. 21 8. This is a full and final release applying to The parties waived the There was reasonable cause for the posting of the 22 defendant real property and the commencement and prosecution of 23 this forfeiture action, and the Court may enter a Certificate of 24 Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. 25 26 27 28 9. All parties are to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. 10. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, shall 4 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Final Judgment of 2 Forfeiture. 3 SO ORDERED THIS 25th day of May , 2011. 4 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 5 6 7 CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE 8 9 Based upon the allegations set forth in the Complaint filed 10 January 15, 2009, and the Stipulation for Final Judgment of 11 Forfeiture filed herein, the Court enters this Certificate of 12 Reasonable Cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465, that there was 13 reasonable cause for the posting of the defendant real property, 14 and for the commencement and prosecution of this forfeiture action. 15 Dated: May 25, 2011 16 17 18 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 Final Judgment of Forfeiture 1 Exhibit A 5322 Silouette, Elk Grove, CA 2 3 Lot 51 as shown on the plat of “Gilliam Meadows Unit 2E, Subdivision No. 02-356.2E” recorded in Book 332 of Maps, Page 1, records of Sacramento County. 4 5 6 7 8 9 “The property is also conveyed and accepted subject to that certain Notice of Non-Adversarial Procedures under Civil Code Section 912 (f) recorded in the Official Records of Sacramento County, on recorded concurrent herewith, as Instrument No., in Book , Page , and any amendments thereto now of record or which will be of record prior to the recordation of this Grant Deed, (collectively “the Notice”), all of which are incorporated herein by reference with the same effect as though fully set forth herein.” 10 APN: 132-1650-051 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 Final Judgment of Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?