Johnson v. Ring
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 04/02/09 GRANTING 5 Request For Dismissal of Evelyn J. Ring without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have until April 30, 2009 to file an amended complaint. Evelyn J Ring terminated. (Streeter, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 09-cv-00145-JAM-GGH PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF EVELYN J. RING AND Proposed ORDER
SCOTT N. JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs.
Evelyn J. Ring,
Complaint Filed: JANUARY 16, 2009 CASE TO BE REMAIN OPEN TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants
IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendant (Evelyn J. Ring) be and is hereby dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to remain open for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint against the correct owner of the property. Defendant (Evelyn J. Ring) is dismissed because this Defendant is deceased. Dated: April 1, 2009 /s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff
1 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-09-00145-JAM-GGH
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED that Defendant, Evelyn J. Ring, is hereby dismissed WITHOUT prejudice and Plaintiff shall have until April 30, 2009 to file an amended complaint.
Dated: April 2, 2009
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________ U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-09-00145-JAM-GGH
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?