Galik v. Namgalama et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/11 ordering that defendants' 09/07/11 request for clarification is resolved. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

KEVIN GALIK,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

No. 2: 09-cv-0152 WBS KJN P

vs.
A. NANGALAMA, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

On September 7, 2011, defendants filed a request for clarification of the

16

scheduling order. The scheduling order states that all pre-trial motions, except motions to

17

compel, are due on or before September 30, 2011. Defendants state that they are unclear as to

18

what the court meant by “pre-trial motions.” Defendants state that “pre-trial” motions could

19

conceivably refer to motions in limine.

20
21

Defendants are informed that the pre-trial motion deadline does not apply to
motions customarily filed before trial, such as motions in limine.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ September 7, 2011

23

request for clarification is resolved.

24

DATED: October 18, 2011
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

gal152.cla

1