Alford v. Clark

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/26/09 ORDERING that this matter is TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. KEN CLARK, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner is presently incarcerated at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility in Kings County. He is serving a sentence for a conviction rendered by the Perris Superior Court in Riverside County. The general rule with regard to habeas applications is that both the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted and the District Court where petitioner is incarcerated have jurisdiction over the claims. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973). In the instant case, both petitioner's conviction and his place of incarceration occurred in an area covered by the District Court for the Central District of California. Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCUS JEROME ALFORD, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-0169 GGH P 1 2 3 4 matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). DATED: January 26, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 GGH:mp alfo0169.108a GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?