Travelers Casualty and Surety v. Bennett Development, et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 42 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/16/2012. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Daron D. Tong (SBN 96220) Michele Miller (SBN 213723) MILLER & TONG, LLP 250 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone (415) 409-5222 Facsimile (415) 409-0467 Attorneys for Plaintiff TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BENNETT DEVELOPMENT, INC., a ) California corporation; DENNIS G. ) BENNETT, an individual and as Trustee of ) THE BENNETT FAMILY TRUST; ) CATHRYN C. BENNETT, an individual; ) FAHRENS CREEK ONE, LLC, a California ) limited liability company; FAHRENS CREEK ) TWO, LLC, a California limited liability ) company; and TULARE WINDMILL ) VENTURE, LLC, a California limited liability ) company, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:09-CV-00174-WBS-GGH ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Hearing Date: October 20, 2011 Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb 23 Plaintiff and all Defendants had previously stipulated to entry of judgment, such stipulation 24 in judgment not to be filed so long as periodic timely payments were made by Defendants. 25 Having received and negotiated all payments pursuant to such stipulation, Plaintiff 26 specifically requests that the Court enter an order dismissing this action in its entirety, with 27 prejudice, all parties to bear their own costs. 28 1 Order Dismissing Action with Prejudice 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: August 16, 2012 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order Dismissing Action with Prejudice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?