Morning Star Packing Company, et al v. SK Foods, et al

Filing 176

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/2/14 DENYING 166 MOTION to COMPEL Response to Interrogatory No. 7 filed by Ingomar Packing Company. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Dale C. Campbell, State Bar No. 99173
James Kachmar, State Bar No. 216781
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
LAW CORPORATION

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
[phone] – Main
[phone] – Facsimile
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Morning Star Packing Company;
Liberty Packing Company, LLC; California Fruit & Tomato Kitchens, LLC;
and The Morning Star Company

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14
15
law corporation

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin

10

16
17
18
19
20
21

THE MORNING STAR PACKING COMPANY, )
a California limited partnership; et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SK FOODS, L.P., a California limited
)
partnership; et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:09-CV-00208 KJM-EFB
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANT INGOMAR PACKING
COMPANY, LLC’S MOTION TO COMPEL
A RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO.
7
Hearing Date:
May 21, 2014
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom:
8

22
23

Defendant Ingomar Packing Company, LLC’s Motion to Compel a Response to

24

Interrogatory No. 7 (Dckt. # 166) came on for hearing on Wednesday, May 21, 2014, at

25

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8 of the above-entitled Court, the Honorable Edmund F.

26

Brennan, Magistrate Judge presiding.

27

Coleman Grodin appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Kyle Zipes of Bingham McCutchen LLP

28

appeared on behalf of Defendant Ingomar Parking Company, LLC. Charles Jaeger of
{1763171.DOCX;}

James Kachmar of Weintraub Tobin Chediak

1

Order After Hearing Re Ingomar’s MTC Response
to Interrogatory No. 7

1

Farmer Brownstein Jaeger LLP appeared on behalf of Defendants Stuart Woolf and Los

2

Gatos Tomato Products.

3

After consideration and for the reasons as stated on the record, Defendant

4

Ingomar Packing Company, LLC’s Motion to Compel a Response to Interrogatory No. 7

5

(Dckt #166) is DENIED.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: June 2, 2014.

Honorable Edmund F. Brennan
U.S. Magistrate Judge

9

11

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

12

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

13
14
15
law corporation

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin

10

16

By:

/s/ - Kyle M. Zipes
Kyle M. Zipes
Attorneys for Defendant
Ingomar Packing Company, LLC

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{1763171.DOCX;}

2

Order After Hearing Re Ingomar’s MTC Response
to Interrogatory No. 7