Morning Star Packing Company, et al v. SK Foods, et al

Filing 181

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/31/14: Discovery due by 12/8/2014. Dispositive Motions shall be filed by 8/31/2015. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP Stephen Zovickian (SBN 78697) stephen.zovickian@bingham.com Sujal Shah (SBN 215230) sujal.shah@bingham.com Kyle Zipes (SBN 251814) kyle.zipes@bingham.com Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 Attorneys for Defendant Ingomar Packing Company 8 9 10 11 RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP Miles Ehrlich (SBN 237954) miles@ramsey-ehrlich.com 803 Hearst Avenue Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510)548-3600 Facsimile: (510)291-3060 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Greg Pruett 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 17 18 The Morning Star Packing Company, et al., No. 2:09-CV-00208-KJM-EFB 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES S.K. Foods, L.P., et al. 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiffs The Morning Star Packing Company, Liberty Packing Company, LLC, California Fruit and Tomato Kitchens, LLC and The Morning Star Company (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendants Ingomar Packing Company, LLC (“Ingomar”), Greg Pruett, Los Gatos Tomato Products (“Los Gatos”), and Stuart Woolf (collectively “Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order to extend the discovery deadline in this action pursuant to Local Rule 144(a). WHEREAS, the parties have continued to take discovery in this action but both agree that the process is taking longer than previously expected; WHEREAS, the Court has granted two previous extensions of the parties’ discovery and dispositive motion deadlines by between 120 and 122 days; and WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have met to explore the possibility of a negotiated resolution of this litigation, and have determined that the prospects for reaching such a resolution, as well as the prospects for conducting this litigation more efficiently if such a resolution cannot be reached, will be materially increased by further extending the discovery deadlines set in this Court’s February 13, 2014 Minute Order; THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The deadline to complete all non-expert related discovery shall be extended ninety (90) days to December 8, 2014. 2. The deadline for the Court to hear disputes related to discovery shall be extended ninety-seven (97) days to January 16, 2015. 3. The deadline for Plaintiffs to complete expert disclosures under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be extended ninety-seven (97) days to February 23, 2015. 4. The deadline for Defendants to complete expert disclosures under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be extended ninety-six (96) days to April 2, 2015. 5. The deadline for parties who previously disclosed an expert to submit a supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject, and to submit an accompanying written report shall be extended ninety-six (96) days to May 7, 2015. 6. The deadline to complete all expert discovery shall be extended ninety-six (96) days to July 16, 2015. 7. The deadline to file all dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders, or other emergency applications, shall be extended one hundred and two (102) days to August 31, 2015. For the Court’s convenience, the parties include the below table of the stipulated revised deadlines. 10 11 Event 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Discovery  Deadline Discovery  Dispute  Deadline Plaintiff’s  expert  disclosures due Defendants’  expert  disclosures due Supplemental  Expert List Due Expert  Discovery  Deadline Dispositive  Motion  Deadline Current  Deadline 9/8/2014 Stipulated and  Proposed  New   Deadline  12/8/2014  10/10/2014 1/16/2015  11/17/2014 2/23/2015  12/26/2014 4/2/2015  1/30/2015 5/7/2015  4/10/2015 7/16/2015  5/20/2015 8/31/2015  The court considers these dates firm. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2014. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES 1 Stipulated to and approved by: 2 DATED: July 31, 2014 BINGHAM McCUTCHEN LLP 3 By: /s/ - Stephen Zovickian Stephen Zovickian Attorneys for Defendant Ingomar Packing Company 4 5 6 7 DATED: July 31, 2014 8 RAMSEY & EHRLICH, LLP By: /s/ - Miles Ehrlich (as authorized on 7/15/2014) Miles Ehrlich Attorneys for Defendant Greg Pruett 9 10 11 DATED: July 31, 2014 By: /s/ - Charles Ralph Jaeger (as authorized on 7/15/2014) Charles Ralph Jaeger Attorneys for Defendants Los Gatos Tomato Products 12 13 14 FARMER BROWNSTEIN JAEGER, LLP DATED: July 31, 2014 15 FARMER BROWNSTEIN JAEGER LLP By: /s/ - Charles Ralph Jaeger (as authorized on 7/15/2014) Charles Ralph Jaeger Attorneys for Defendant Stuart Woolf 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: July 31, 2014 WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK LAW CORPORATION By: s/ - James Kachmar (as authorized on 7/15/2014) James Kachmar Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Morning Star Packing Company, Liberty Packing Company, LLC, California Fruit and Tomato Kitchens, LLC and The Morning Star Company 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?