Morning Star Packing Company, et al v. SK Foods, et al

Filing 312

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/16/2017 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing re 306 Motion for Reconsideration to 11/17/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; ORDERING defendants Ingomar Packing Company, Greg Pruett, Los Gatos Tomato Products, Stuart Woolf to file and serve an opposition to said motion by 10/27/2017; ORDERING the plaintiffs to file and serve any reply by 11/10/2017. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Donn P. Pickett (SBN 72257) donn.pickett@morganlewis.com Sujal J. Shah (SBN 215230) sujal.shah@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, California 94105-1596 Telephone: 415.442.1000 Facsimile: 415.442.1001 Attorneys for Defendant Ingomar Packing Company, LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 THE MORNING STAR PACKING COMPANY, a California limited partnership; et al., Plaintiffs, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 v. SK FOODS, L.P., a California limited partnership; et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00208 KJM-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER Current Date: September 8, 2017 Requested New Date: November 17, 2017 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 3, 15th Floor Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller Complaint Filed: January 22, 2009 Trial Date: No Trial Date Set 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants Ingomar Packing Company, LLC and Greg Pruett (collectively the 27 “Ingomar Defendants”) and Plaintiffs The Morning Star Packing Company, Liberty Packing 28 Company, LLC, California Fruit & Tomato Kitchens, LLC, and The Morning Star Company STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00208 KJM-EFB 1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the 2 following stipulation and proposed order pursuant to Local Rule 230(f) of the U.S. District Court, 3 Eastern District of California. 4 5 6 WHEREAS, on July 12, 2017 (Dkt. 306), Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Summary Judgment Order entered on June 14, 2017 (Dkt. 304) (hereinafter, the “Motion”), and parties later stipulated, and the Court approved, that the hearing for the Motion be 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 set for September 8, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. before this Court; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and the Ingomar Defendants are currently engaged in settlement discussions; WHEREAS, a settlement between Plaintiffs and the Ingomar Defendants will moot the Motion as it applies to the Ingomar Defendants; WHEREAS, continuing the hearing to allow for settlement discussions between Plaintiffs 14 and the Ingomar Defendants is in the interest of judicial economy and will conserve judicial and 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 party resources; WHEREAS, having a single hearing on the Motion is also in the interest of judicial economy and will conserve judicial and party resources; WHEREAS, counsel for Los Gatos Tomato Products and Stuart Woolf (the “Los Gatos Defendants”) has indicated that the Los Gatos Defendants take no position on this stipulation; WHEREAS, subject to court approval, Plaintiffs and the Ingomar Defendants have agreed 22 to continue the September 8, 2017 hearing to November 17, 2017 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, the Los Gatos Defendants do not oppose such a continuance; WHEREAS, consistent with the proposed November 17, 2017 hearing date, the parties have also agreed to a briefing schedule for the Motion. THEREFORE, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00208 KJM-EFB 1 1. The current September 8, 2017 hearing date scheduled for the Motion for 2 Reconsideration of the Court’s Summary Judgment Order shall be continued to November 17, 3 2017 at 10:00 a.m. 4 5 6 2. The deadline for the Los Gatos Defendants and the Ingomar Defendants to file and serve an opposition to the Motion shall be no later than October 27, 2017; 3. The deadline for Plaintiffs to file and serve a Reply to the opposition to the Motion 7 8 9 10 shall be on or before November 10, 2017. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: August 14, 2017 MORGAN LEWIS AND BOCKIUS, LLP 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Sujal Shah Sujal Shah Attorneys for Defendant Ingomar Packing Company 14 15 Dated: August 14, 2017 RAMSEY & EHRLICH LLP 16 By: 17 18 /s/ Miles Ehrlich (as authorized on August 11, 2017) Miles Ehrlich Attorneys for Defendant Gregory R. Pruett 19 20 Dated: August 14, 2017 WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN Law Corporation 21 By: /s/ Dale C. Campbell (as authorized on August 11, 2017) Dale C. Campbell Attorneys for All Plaintiffs 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 16, 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER CASE NO. 2:09-CV-00208 KJM-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?