Foster v. Stanton et al

Filing 6

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/14/09 ORDERING that within 20 days from the date of this order plaintiff shall show cause in writing, if any he has, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On March 10, 2009, plaintiff, the only party to appear in this action, consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADRIAN FOSTER, Plaintiff, vs. GARY STANTON, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 By an order filed February 26, 2009, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed a completed in forma pauperis application. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days from the date of this order plaintiff shall show cause in writing, if any he has, why this action should not be ///// ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE No. 2:09-cv-0218-JFM (PC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 dismissed without prejudice. Failure to respond to this order will result in the dismissal of this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Local Rule 11-110. DATED: April 14, 2009. 12 f o s t0 2 1 8 . o s c 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?