Gomez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 42

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 06/10/10 ORDERING that the action is DISMISSED w/ prejudice per FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Clerk to close file. CASE CLOSED(Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP John S. Gilmore, State Bar No. 32491 Stephanie L. Quinn, State Bar No. 216655 1030 G Street Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 443-4443 Facsimile: (916) 443-2124 Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHELBY GOMEZ, a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, ARNOLD GOMEZ, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-CV-00225 MCE-KJN STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON 13 vs. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 R a n d o lp h C r e gg e r & C h a lf a n t UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and DOES 1 - L, inclusive, Defendants. / IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their attorneys of record that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Dated: June 10, 2010 HAMPTON & RAWLINGS /s/ Keith Hampton KEITH HAMPTON Attorneys for Plaintiff SHELBY GOMEZ, a minor by and through her Guardian ad Litem, ARNOLD GOMEZ 25 26 1 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 10, 2010 RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP /s/ John S. Gilmore JOHN S. GILMORE Attorneys for Defendant UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 R a n d o lp h C r e gg e r & C h a lf a n t Dated: June 10, 2010 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 2 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?