McCloud v. Solano County Sheriff's Department et al
Filing
33
ORDER denying 32 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/03/10. (Plummer, M)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied. ///// ///// ///// 1 ORDER vs. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICKY J. McCLOUD, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0284 GGH P
1 2 3 4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 20, 2010 motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 32) is denied. DATED: June 3, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
GGH:mp mccl0284.31(2)
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?