Stringham v. Bick et al

Filing 107

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/29/14 DISMISSING ACTION with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A). CASE CLOSED.(Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SACRAMENTO

11
12

Case No. 2:09-CV-0286 MCE DAD P
GUY STRINGHAM,
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))

13
14

v.

15
16

J. BICK, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff Guy Stringham and Defendants Bick, Khoury, Andreasen, Donahue, Thomas, and

19

Moreno have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of

20

the entire action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

21

Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.

22

It is so stipulated.

23

Dated:

July 17, 2014

/s/ Guy Stringham
Guy Stringham
Plaintiff Pro Se

Dated:

July 23, 2014

/s/ Jon S. Allin
Jon S. Allin
Attorney for Defendants

24
25
26
27
28

1

1
2

The undersigned has reviewed the stipulation signed by the parties. Pursuant to that
stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

3

1. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and

4

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

5

Dated: July 29, 2014

6
7
8
9

/stri0286.stip

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2