Stringham v. Bick et al
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/15/12 ORDERING that 65 Motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order is GRANTED IN PART; Defendants Andreasen, Moreno and Thomas shall serve their responses to plaintiffs interrogatories on or before November 21, 2012; and Defendants shall file and serve their opposition to plaintiffs pending motion for summary judgment and their cross-motion for summary judgment, if any, on or before December 21, 2012. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GUY T. STRINGHAM,
11
Plaintiff,
No. 2: 09-0286 MCE DAD P
Defendants.
ORDER
12
13
vs.
J. BICK, et al.,
14
15
/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a complaint filed pursuant to 42
16
17
U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants answered the complaint on June 8, 2012. On June 22, 2012, a
18
discovery and scheduling order was issued by the court. Under that order, all discovery was to be
19
completed by October 5, 2012 and all pretrial motions were to be filed on or before December
20
28, 2012.
21
In July 2012, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. (See Dkt. No. 58.)
22
Thereafter, defendants requested an extension of time until October 15, 2012 to file an opposition
23
to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as well as a cross-motion for summary judgment.
24
(See Dkt. No. 59.) The court granted defendants’ request. (See Dkt. No. 60.)
25
26
On October 11, 2012, shortly before their opposition and any cross-motion were
due to be filed, defendants’ filed a motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order. (See
1
1
Dkt. No. 65.) Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion to modify the discovery and scheduling
2
order will be granted in part.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. Defendants’ motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order (Dkt. No.
5
65.) is GRANTED IN PART;
6
7
2. Defendants’ Andreasen, Moreno and Thomas shall serve their responses to
plaintiff’s interrogatories on or before November 21, 2012; and
8
9
3. Defendants shall file and serve their opposition to plaintiff’s pending motion
for summary judgment and their cross-motion for summary judgment, if any, on or before
10
December 21, 2012.
11
DATED: October 15, 2012.
12
13
14
15
16
DAD:dpw
stri0286.36disc
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?