Stringham v. Bick et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/18/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Motion for an Extension of time 69 is GRANTED; and Plaintiff shall place his opposition in the mail on or before 3/18/2013. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUY T. STRINGHAM, 11 Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-0286 MCE DAD P Defendants. ORDER 12 13 vs. J. BICK, et al., 14 15 / 16 Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to 17 defendants’ December 21, 2012 cross-motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT 18 IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 69) is granted; and 20 2. Plaintiff shall place his opposition in the mail on or before March 18, 2013. 21 Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 230(l). 22 DATED: January 18, 2013. 23 24 25 dad1.hm stri0286.36opp.wpd 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?