Evans v. Sisto et al
Filing
154
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/9/2012, ORDERING plaintiff to inform the court in writing no later than 10 days after completion of the state court criminal proceedings now pending against plaintiff in Santa Clara County that the proceedings have concluded and the nature of the disposition; within 30 days, any party may file a written request for a settlement conference in this matter, if both parties request a settlement conference, the matter will be set for settlement conference before the undersigned if both parties waive disqualification; and all pending 136 , 149 motions are DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JAMES EVANS, JR.,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:09-cv-0292 WBS JFM (PC)
vs.
D. K. SISTO, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a former state prisoner on parole proceeding through counsel with a
17
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. By order filed August 6, 2012, the trial date set
18
in this matter was vacated and the matter was referred back to the undersigned for all further
19
pretrial proceedings. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
20
1. Plaintiff shall inform the court in writing not later than ten days after
21
completion of the state court criminal proceedings now pending against plaintiff in Santa Clara
22
County that the proceedings have concluded and the nature of the disposition; and
23
2. Within thirty days from the date of this order any party may file a written
24
request for a settlement conference in this matter. If both parties request a settlement conference,
25
/////
26
/////
1
1
the matter will be set for settlement conference before the undersigned if both parties waive
2
disqualification.
3
4
3. All pending motions are denied without prejudice.
DATED: August 9, 2012.
5
6
7
8
9
12
evan0292.o7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?