Evans v. Sisto et al
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 9/9/10 ORDERING upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge 74 is AFFIRMED. (Carlos, K)
<![CDATA[
(PC) Evans v. Sisto et al
Doc. 79
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. FELKER, et al., Defendants. / On August 13, 2010, plaintiff filed a document styled as objections to the magistrate judge's order filed August 6, 2010, granting defendants leave to conduct plaintiff's deposition by videoconference. The court construes plaintiff's objections as a request for reconsideration of that order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. ///// ///// ///// ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES EVANS, Plaintiff, No. 2:09-cv-0292 WBS JFM (PC)
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed August 6, 2010, is affirmed. DATED: September 9, 2010
2
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
