Hardy v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/13/09. This Action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Debbie P. Kirkpatrick, Esq. (SBN 207112) Albert R. Limberg, Esq. (SBN 211110) SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL, L.L.P. 3667 Voltaire Street San Diego, CA 92106-1253 Tel: 619/758-1891 Fax: 619/222-3667 dpk@sessions-law.biz alimberg@sessions-law.biz Attorney for NCO Financial Systems, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID HARDY, Plaintiff, vs. NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. ) Case No. 09 CV 00310-JAM-KJM ) ) ) ) STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH ) PREJUDICE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, DAVID HARDY, filed the present action against NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC. ("NCO") on February 3, 2009. NCO filed its responsive pleading on March 9, 2009. The parties subsequently resolved the action in its entirety. As part of said resolution, the parties agree to dismiss the entire action with prejudice. Stipulation To Dismiss With Prejudice 1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above captioned action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 41. Dated: 7/13/09 KROHN & MOSS, LTD. /s/ Michael S. Agruss Michael S. Agruss, Attorney for Plaintiff, David Hardy Dated: 7/13/09 SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL, L.L.P. /s/Debbie P. Kirkpatrick Debbie P. Kirkpatrick, Attorney for Defendant, NCO Financial Systems, Inc. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 13, 2009 /s/ John A. Mendez___________________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Judge Stipulation To Dismiss With Prejudice 2 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?