Willis v. Weeks

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/16/11 ORDERING that within 14 days of the date of this order, defendant Weeks shall file an opposition to plaintiffs motion to quash.(Dillon, M)

(PC) Willis v. Weeks

Doc. 32

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. R. WEEKS, Defendant. / On October 25, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to quash a subpoena issued by defendant Weeks seeking plaintiff's "mental and psychiatric records" from September 2002 to the present from his institution of confinement . Defendant Weeks has not filed an opposition to that motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Moreover, on April 14, 2009, the court issued an order requiring the parties to brief discovery motions pending before the court. ///// ///// ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT WILLIS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-0342 MCE DAD P

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:9 will0342.46mtq

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen days of the date of this order, defendant Weeks shall file an opposition to plaintiff's motion to quash. DATED: March 16, 2011.

2