Wyatt v. Martel

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/11/10 ORDERING the findings and recommendations filed 3/16/10 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. CASE CLOSED.(Carlos, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On March 16, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 1 vs. MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, Respondent. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD L. WYATT, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-353 LKK CHS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. The findings and recommendations filed March 16, 2010 are adopted in full; and Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. DATED: May 11, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?