Watkins v. Knowles et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/3/2010 ORDERING that the 14 findings and recommendations filed December 11, 2009, are ADOPTED in full. Respondent's 12 April 21, 2009 motion to dismiss is DENIED. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition within sixty days. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MIKE KNOWLES, Warden, Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On December 11, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOEL KEITH WATKINS, Petitioner, No. CIV S-09-0363 WBS DAD P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full; 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 11, 2009, are adopted in 2. Respondent's April 21, 2009 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 12) is denied; and 3. Respondent is directed to file an answer to the petition within sixty days. DATED: February 3, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?