Johnson v. Luong et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/20/09 re 7 ORDERING that defendant Hien Luong shall have until May 23, 2009 to respond to complaint.(Duong, D)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SCOTT N. JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. LUONG, et. al., Defendants
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No.2:09-cv-00374-FCD-KJM STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL MAY 23, 2009 FOR DEFENDANT HIEN LUONG TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-144 (a), Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson and Defendant, Hien Luong, by and through, Scott N. Johnson; Hien Luong (PRO SE), stipulate as follows: 1. An extension of time has been previously
obtained for Defendant Hien Luong until April 23, 2009 to respond or otherwise plead
reference to Plaintiff's complaint.
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2. Defendant Hien Luong is granted an extension until May 23, 2009 to respond or otherwise
plead reference to Plaintiff's complaint. 3. Defendant Hien Luong's response will be due no later than May 23, 2009.
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of April 20, 2009
Dated:
April 17, 2009
/s/Hien Luong______ ___ Hien Luong PRO SE
Dated:
April 20, 2009
/s/Scott N. Johnson ____ Scott N. Johnson, Attorney for Plaintiff
IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendant Hien Luong shall have until May 23, 2009 to respond to complaint.
Dated: April 20, 2009
_______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?