Coalition for a Sustainable Delta et al v. City of Stockton et al

Filing 78

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/30/2009 DENYING dft's 64 Motion for Reconsideration. (Suttles, J)

1 R. MORGAN GILHULY (State Bar No. 133659) JOSHUA A. BLOOM (State Bar No. 183358) 2 LAURA S. BERNARD (State Bar No. 197556) CHRISTOPHER D. JENSEN (State Bar No. 235108) 3 BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP 350 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94104-1435 Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Coalition for a Sustainable Delta, 7 Belridge Water Storage District, Berrenda Mesa Water District, Cawelo Water District, North of the River Municipal Water District, 8 Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District, and Dee Dillon 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B)(6) U.S.D.C Case No. Civ. 2:09-cv-00466-JAM-DAD 672790.1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION COALITION FOR A SUSTAINABLE DELTA, a California nonprofit corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, a municipal corporation, and COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, a political subdivision of the State of California, Defendants. Case No. 2:09-cv-00466-JAM-DAD ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(b)(6) Judge: Date: Time: Location: John A. Mendez November 18, 2009 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 6

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On November 18, 2009, Defendant County of San Joaquin's Motion for Reconsideration Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) came on for hearing before the Honorable John M. Mendez at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 6 of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, with counsel for all parties appearing before the Court. After consideration of the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the Motion, the arguments of counsel, and the Court's findings at the hearing as set forth in the transcript, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED.

Dated: November 30, 2009

/s/ John A. Mendez________ United States District Judge

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dated: November 25, 2009

By:

BARG COFFIN LEWIS & TRAPP, LLP

/s/ Joshua A. Bloom Joshua A. Bloom Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: November 25, 2009

By:

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

/s/ Nicole E. Granquist Nicole E. Granquist Attorney for Defendant County of San Joaquin

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B)(6) U.S.D.C Case No. Civ. 2:09-cv-00466-JAM-DAD

1

672790.1

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com